Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect
- PMID: 28320705
- PMCID: PMC5502230
- DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect
Abstract
When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.
Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- Boxall AM, Barclay L, Sayers A, et al. . Managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the community. A randomized controlled trial of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for elderly housebound patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2005;25:378–85. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources