Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 24;61(6):e02209-16.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02209-16. Print 2017 Jun.

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam against Gram-Negative ESKAPE Pathogens Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in the United States in 2015 (Results from the SMART Global Surveillance Program)

Affiliations

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam against Gram-Negative ESKAPE Pathogens Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in the United States in 2015 (Results from the SMART Global Surveillance Program)

Sibylle H Lob et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Relebactam (formerly MK-7655) is an inhibitor of class A and C β-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), and is currently in clinical development in combination with imipenem-cilastatin. Using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution methodology, we evaluated the in vitro activities of imipenem-relebactam, imipenem, and seven routinely tested parenteral antimicrobial agents against Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens (including Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 689; Acinetobacter baumannii, n = 72; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 845; and Enterobacter spp., n = 399) submitted by 21 clinical laboratories in the United States in 2015 as part of the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) global surveillance program. Relebactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml in combination with doubling dilutions of imipenem. Imipenem-relebactam MICs were interpreted using CLSI imipenem breakpoints. The respective rates of susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam and imipenem were 94.2% (796/845) and 70.3% (594/845) for P. aeruginosa, 99.0% (682/689) and 96.1% (662/689) for K. pneumoniae, and 100% (399/399) and 98.0% (391/399) for Enterobacter spp. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 80.5% (202/251), 74.1% (20/27), and 100% (8/8) of isolates of imipenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter spp. Relebactam did not increase the number of isolates of Acinetobacter spp. susceptible to imipenem, and the rates of resistance to all of the agents tested against this pathogen were >30%. Further development of imipenem-relebactam is warranted given the demonstrated ability of relebactam to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa that are nonsusceptible to carbapenems and its potential as a therapy for treating patients with antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections.

Keywords: ESKAPE pathogens; SMART; imipenem; relebactam; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Effects of relebactam on the distributions of MICs for imipenem against 845 P. aeruginosa isolates (a), 251 imipenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates (b), 689 K. pneumoniae isolates (c), 27 imipenem-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae isolates (d), 399 Enterobacter species isolates (e), and 8 imipenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacter species isolates (f). Arrows indicate the modes of the MIC distributions. Dashed lines represent the imipenem CLSI susceptibility breakpoints of ≤2 μg/ml for P. aeruginosa and ≤1 μg/ml for Enterobacteriaceae.

References

    1. Livermore DM. 2001. Of Pseudomonas, porins, pumps and carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:247–250. doi:10.1093/jac/47.3.247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Martinez Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2009. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4783–4788. doi:10.1128/AAC.00574-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riera E, Cabot G, Mulet X, Garcia-Castillo M, del Campo R, Juan C, Canton R, Oliver A. 2011. Pseudomonas aeruginosa carbapenem resistance mechanisms in Spain: impact on the activity of imipenem, meropenem and doripenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2022–2027. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castanheira M, Mills JC, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. 2014. Mutation-driven β-lactam resistance mechanisms among contemporary ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6844–6850. doi:10.1128/AAC.03681-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toussaint KA, Gallagher JC. 2015. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: from then to now. Ann Pharmacother 49:86–98. doi:10.1177/1060028014556652. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources