Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;78(2):139-144.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593438. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Single Layer Repair of Large Anterior Skull Base Defects without Vascularized Mucosal Flap

Frederick Yoo  1 , Marilene B Wang  1 , Marvin Bergsneider  2 , Jeffrey D Suh  1
Affiliations

Single Layer Repair of Large Anterior Skull Base Defects without Vascularized Mucosal Flap

Frederick Yoo et al. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives Bilateral anterior skull base (ASB) defects following endoscopic endonasal tumor resection are most commonly repaired utilizing multilayered reconstruction with a vascularized mucosal flap. Single-layer closure of large ASB defects has been described in the literature but this technique has yet to gain a widespread use. We report our experience with a series of patients who underwent reconstruction of large ASB defects using a single-layer intradural graft, without nasoseptal flaps. We also compared the use of acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm, LifeCell, Branchburg, New Jersey, United States) or collagen matrix xenograft (Duramatrix, Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) as the graft biomaterial. Design A retrospective case series. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Main Outcome Measures Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, the number of postoperative debridements, the number of postoperative infections, and time to remucosalization. Results Two patients were reconstructed with AlloDerm and three with Duramatrix, with all patients receiving postoperative external beam radiation. There were no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks identified in these patients during follow-up. The AlloDerm group showed increased postsurgical crusting, the number of clinically apparent postoperative infections, and an increased time to remucosalization. Conclusions Single-layer repair without a vascularized mucosal flap is a viable method of skull base repair for large ASB defects. We found repair with Duramatrix was superior, with less graft crusting and infection, requiring fewer debridements.

Keywords: anterior cranial fossa; biocompatible materials; paranasal sinus neoplasms; reconstructive surgical procedures; skull base; skull base neoplasm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sagittal MRI (T1 sequence) of reconstruction. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; nt, nasal trumpet; pp, pope pack - nasal packing fashioned from merocel sponge placed inside a a finger of a sterile glove (highlighted).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intraoperative photograph of skull base defect for patient 1. fs, frontal sinus; LP, lamina papyracea.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intraoperative photograph of AlloDerm (LifeCell, Branchburg, New Jersey, United States) reconstruction of skull base defect for patient 1. fs, frontal sinus; LP, lamina papyracea; ss, sphenoid sinus.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Intraoperative photograph of Duramatrix (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) reconstruction of skull base defect for patient 3. LP, lamina papyracea; ss, sphenoid sinus.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Postoperative photograph of Duramatrix (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) reconstruction of skull base for patient 3, approximately 10 months after surgery. fs, frontal sinus; ss, sphenoid sinus.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Graph of SNOT-22 scores for each patient. Preoperative SNOT-22 score was unavailable for patient 1. Patients 4 and 5 without postoperative SNOT-22 scores beyond 3 months. SNOT-22, sinonasal outcome test. Lower score on SNOT-22 denotes improved quality of life.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zuniga M G, Turner J H, Chandra R K. Updates in anterior skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(1):75–82. - PubMed
    1. Suh J D, Ramakrishnan V R, Chi J J, Palmer J N, Chiu A G. Outcomes and complications of endoscopic approaches for malignancies of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(1):54–59. - PubMed
    1. Chin D, Harvey R J. Endoscopic reconstruction of frontal, cribiform and ethmoid skull base defects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;74:104–118. - PubMed
    1. Patel M R, Stadler M E, Snyderman C H. et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base. 2010;20(6):397–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eloy J A, Patel S K, Shukla P A, Smith M L, Choudhry O J, Liu J K. Triple-layer reconstruction technique for large cribriform defects after endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(3):204–211. - PubMed