Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;32(8):935-939.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient

Affiliations
Review

Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient

Lois Snyder Sulmasy et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient-physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient-physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP's Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient-physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

    1. Frankel RM. Computers in the examination room. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:128–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6559. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Partnership for Women & Families Report. Engaging patients and families: how consumers value and use health IT; December 2014. Accessed at www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/health-care/HIT/engaging-pa... on 10 February 2017.
    1. Ober KP, Applegate WB. The electronic health record. Are we the tools of our tools? Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2015;78:8–14. - PubMed
    1. Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T, for the American College of Physicians Medical Informatics Committee Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:301–3. doi: 10.7326/M14-2128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record—are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA. 2013;309:991–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.890. - DOI - PMC - PubMed