Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;8(3):229-237.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12428. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of surgically resected pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor and K-ras mutation

Affiliations

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of surgically resected pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor and K-ras mutation

Kaoru Kaseda et al. Thorac Cancer. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and K-ras genes and their clinicopathological and prognostic features in patients with resected pathological stage I adenocarcinoma.

Methods: We examined 224 patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma and analyzed the prognostic and predictive value of these mutations in 162 patients with pathological stage I adenocarcinoma.

Results: Mutations of the EGFR and K-ras genes were detected in 100 (44.6%) and 19 (8.5%) of all tumors, and in 81 (50.0%) and 17 (10.5%) of the pathological stage I tumors, respectively. EGFR mutations were significantly associated with female gender, smoking habit (never smoker), and low grade. By contrast, K-ras mutations were significantly associated with male gender, smoking habit (ever smoker), and the presence of mucinous components. No significant differences were observed in recurrence-free or overall survival between the EGFR-mutant, K-ras-mutant, and wild-type groups (five-year recurrence-free survival 77.8% vs. 87.8% vs. 79.5%; five-year overall survival 82.8% vs. 82.4% vs. 79.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that neither EGFR nor K-ras mutation was an independent prognostic factor.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that pathological stage I adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR and K-ras gene mutations have distinct clinicopathological features. The presence of these mutations alone were not prognostic factors in patients with resected pathological stage I adenocarcinoma.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; K-ras; epidermal growth factor receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Recurrence‐free survival curves of pathological stage I patients after pulmonary resection. Data are shown for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras mutations and for those who were wild type for both genes. (b) Overall survival curves of pathological stage I patients with EGFR and Kras mutations or both wild‐type genes after pulmonary resection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sheel AR, McShane J, Poullis MP. Survival of patients with or without symptoms undergoing potentially curative resections for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 276–84. - PubMed
    1. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC et al. Paclitaxel‐carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non‐small‐cell lung cancer. (Published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 318.) N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2542–50. - PubMed
    1. Reck M, Heigener DF, Mok T, Soria JC, Rabe KF. Management of non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Recent developments. Lancet 2013; 382: 709–19. - PubMed
    1. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin‐based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX‐Lung 3 and LUX‐Lung 6): Analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 141–51. - PubMed
    1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non‐small‐cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2129–39. - PubMed

MeSH terms