Comparative efficacy and tolerability of sarilumab 150 and 200 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 28324148
- DOI: 10.1007/s00393-017-0292-6
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of sarilumab 150 and 200 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of every other week (q2w) dosing of sarilumab 150 and 200 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: In this network meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and tolerability of sarilumab in patients with active RA were included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to combine the direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs.
Results: Four RCTs, involving 2667 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 response rate was significantly higher in the sarilumab 200 mg and sarilumab 200 mg + methotrexate (MTX) groups than in the placebo + MTX group (odds ratio, OR, of 4.05, 95% credible interval, CrI, of 2.04-8.33 and OR of 3.75, 95% CrI of 2.37-5.72, respectively). Compared to the placebo + MTX group, the sarilumab 150 mg + MTX and adalimumab 40 mg groups showed a significantly higher ACR50 response rate. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that sarilumab 200 mg was likely to achieve the best ACR50 response rate (SUCRA = 0.8518), followed by sarilumab 200 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.8225), sarilumab 150 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.5112), adalimumab 40 mg (SUCRA = 0.3072), and placebo + MTX (SUCRA = 0.0072). The ACR50 and ACR70 response rate distributions were comparable, except that sarilumab 200 mg + MTX was likely to achieve the best ACR70 response rate. The tolerability based on the number of patient withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs) did not differ significantly between the treatments, except that placebo + MTX was likely to be the best tolerated.
Conclusion: Sarilumab 150 and 200 mg are efficacious treatments for active RA and are well tolerated.
Keywords: Efficacy; Network meta-analysis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Sarilumab; Tolerability.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and olokizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Z Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;83(Suppl 1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s00393-022-01315-0. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Z Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 36607422 English.
-
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;37(6):1471-1479. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4006-5. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Clin Rheumatol. 2018. PMID: 29404725
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab in comparison with adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Sep;59(9):618-626. doi: 10.5414/CP204017. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021. PMID: 34281633
-
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;22(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13616. Epub 2019 Jun 18. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 31211506
-
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Jan;40(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00863-9. Clin Drug Investig. 2020. PMID: 31602572 Review.
Cited by
-
Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 12;9:991783. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.991783. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36314034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sarilumab Administration in COVID-19 Patients: Literature Review and Considerations.Infect Dis Rep. 2022 May 11;14(3):360-371. doi: 10.3390/idr14030040. Infect Dis Rep. 2022. PMID: 35645219 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmaco-immunomodulatory interventions for averting cytokine storm-linked disease severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection.Inflammopharmacology. 2022 Feb;30(1):23-49. doi: 10.1007/s10787-021-00903-x. Epub 2022 Jan 20. Inflammopharmacology. 2022. PMID: 35048262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 infection: an overview on cytokine storm and related interventions.Virol J. 2022 May 26;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01814-1. Virol J. 2022. PMID: 35619180 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous