Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;4(6):635-645.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0217-x. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Establishing cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory in Saudi Arabia and producing preliminary calibration curve of dicentric chromosomes as biomarker for medical dose estimation in response to radiation emergencies

Affiliations

Establishing cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory in Saudi Arabia and producing preliminary calibration curve of dicentric chromosomes as biomarker for medical dose estimation in response to radiation emergencies

Khaled Al-Hadyan et al. 3 Biotech. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

In cases of public or occupational radiation overexposure and eventual radiological accidents, it is important to provide dose assessment, medical triage, diagnoses and treatment to victims. Cytogenetic bio-dosimetry based on scoring of dicentric chromosomal aberrations assay (DCA) is the "gold standard" biotechnology technique for estimating medically relevant radiation doses. Under the auspices of the National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan in Saudi Arabia, we have set up a biodosimetry laboratory and produced a national standard dose-response calibration curve for DCA, pre-required to estimate the doses received. For this, the basic cytogenetic DCA technique needed to be established. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were collected from four healthy volunteers and irradiated with radiation doses between 0 and 5 Gy of 320 keV X-rays. Then, lymphocytes were PHA stimulated, Colcemid division arrested and stained cytogenetic slides were prepared. The Metafer4 system (MetaSystem) was used for automatic and manually assisted metaphase finding and scoring of dicentric chromosomes. Results were fit to the linear-quadratic dose-effect model according to the IAEA EPR-Biodosimetry-2011 report. The resulting manually assisted dose-response calibration curve (Y = 0.0017 + 0.026 × D + 0.081 × D2) was in the range of those described in other populations. Although the automated scoring over-and-under estimates DCA at low (<1 Gy) and high (>2 Gy) doses, respectively, it showed potential for use in triage mode to segregate between victims with potential risk to develop acute radiotoxicity syndromes. In conclusion, we have successfully established the first biodosimetry laboratory in the region and have produced a preliminary national dose-response calibration curve. The laboratory can now contribute to the national preparedness plan in response to eventual radiation emergencies in addition to providing information for decision makers and public health officials who assess the magnitude of public, medical, occupational and accidental radiation exposures.

Keywords: Biodosimetry; Cytogenetics; Dicentric chromosomes; Dose–response calibration curve; Radiation overexposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative example of metaphase with dicentric chromosome captured by the Metafer4 system (upper panel) and normal metaphase in control (0 Gy) and dicentric (arrow), acentric fragments (squared arrow head) and rings (rounded arrow head) in irradiated lymphocytes (lower panel)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Linear-quadratic dose–response curves (solid lines) for dicentric chromosomal aberrations induced by 320 keV X-rays in lymphocytes derived from four Saudi volunteers. Data points represent the yield of dicentric per metaphase scored using manually assisted mode. Broken lines are the 95 % confidence limits calculated assuming Poisson distribution. Error bars represent the standard errors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Linear-quadratic dose–response calibration curves (solid lines) for dicentric chromosomal aberrations induced by 320 keV X-rays in lymphocytes derived from four Saudi volunteers. Data points represent the yield of dicentric per metaphase scored using either manually assisted (circles) or automated (diamonds) mode. Broken lines are the 95 % confidence limits calculated assuming Poisson distribution. Error bars represent the standard errors
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Illustrative practical example of estimating radiation dose received, with its 95 % confidence interval, in a scenario of total body irradiation using CABAS software. Utilizing the coefficients of the national calibration curve, a hypothetical accidental over-exposure that yields, for example, 150 dicentric per 280 metaphases, would be caused by an absorbed dose of 2.416 Gy with a lower and upper 95 % confidence limits of 2.21 and 2.63 Gy, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aldelaijan S, Nobah A, Alsbeih G, Moftah B, Aldahlawi I, Alzahrany A, Tomic N, Devic S. Dosimetry of biological irradiations using radiochromic films. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(10):3177–3189. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/10/3177. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander GASH, Amundson SA, Blakely WF, Buddemeier B, Gallez B, Dainiak N, Goans RE, Hayes RB, Lowry PC, Noska MA, Okunieff P, Salner AL, Schauer DA, Trompier F, Turteltaub KW, Voisin P, Wiley AL, Jr, Wilkins R. BiodosEPR-2006 Meeting: acute dosimetry consensus committee recommendations on biodosimetry applications in events involving uses of radiation by terrorists and radiation accidents. Radiat Meas. 2007;42(6–7):24.
    1. Aljohani MS (2008) Peaceful applications of nuclear technology in the GCC countries. In: Atom for peace conferences, Jeddah
    1. Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Caballin MR, Miro R, Ribas M, Egozcue J. Biological dosimetry in simulated in vitro partial irradiations. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;71(4):435–440. doi: 10.1080/095530097144058. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beinke C, Braselmann H, Meineke V. Establishment of an x-ray standard calibration curve by conventional dicentric analysis as prerequisite for accurate radiation dose assessment. Health Phys. 2010;98(2):261–268. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181b35a53. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources