Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;14(2):126-135.
doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.2.126. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Effects of Education on Differential Item Functioning on the 15-Item Modified Korean Version of the Boston Naming Test

Affiliations

Effects of Education on Differential Item Functioning on the 15-Item Modified Korean Version of the Boston Naming Test

Byung-Soo Kim et al. Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Education is expected to have an effect on differential item functioning (DIF) on the 15-item Modified Boston Naming Test in the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (BNT-KC). However, no study has examined DIF in the BNT-KC.

Methods: We used the item response theory to investigate the impact of education on the DIF in the BNT-KC among elderly individuals with or without dementia (n=720). A two-parameter item response model was used to determine the difficulty and discrimination parameters of each item. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to address the risk of Type I errors on multiple testing.

Results: Four items, "mermaid," "acorn," "compass," and "pomegranate" continued to demonstrate DIF after controlling for multiple comparisons. Those with low education levels were more likely to error on "mermaid" and "compass," while those with high education levels were more likely to error on "acorn" and "pomegranate." "Hand" and "red pepper" were too easily identified to be used for detecting dementia patients. "Monk's hat" and "pomegranate" were less discriminating than other items, limiting their usefulness in clinical setting.

Conclusion: These findings may provide useful information for the development of a revised version of the BNT-KC to help clinicians make diagnostic decisions more accurately.

Keywords: Dementia; Diagnostic errors; Education; Language tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Item characteristic curve. α: discrimination parameter, β: difficulty parameter.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Item characteristic curves for the items of the 15-item Modified Boston Naming Test in the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (BNT-KC). Four items, namely “(8) mermaid”, “(9) acorn”, “(10) compass”, and “(12) pomegranate”, demonstrated differential item functioning between the low and high education groups. “(1) Hand” and “(2) red pepper” were too easy for most subjects. “(12) Pomegranate” and “(15) monk's hat” seemed less useful for the diagnosis of dementia due to their low discriminating feature.

References

    1. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1994.
    1. Jacobs DM, Sano M, Dooneief G, Marder K, Bell KL, Stern Y. Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1995;45:957–962. - PubMed
    1. Knesevich JW, LaBarge E, Edwards D. Predictive value of the Boston Naming Test in mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res. 1986;19:155–161. - PubMed
    1. Kittner SJ, White LR, Farmer ME, Wolz M, Kaplan E, Moes E, et al. Methodological issues in screening for dementia: the problem of education adjustment. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:163–170. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources