Ovulation monitoring and fertility knowledge: Their relationship to fertility experience in a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 28326545
- DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12606
Ovulation monitoring and fertility knowledge: Their relationship to fertility experience in a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Various aspects of fertility knowledge, including the timing of the fertile window, have consistently been found to be poor. Limited evidence also suggests ovulation monitoring to time intercourse could be common. However, there have been no studies that compare these two aspects of fertility and women's fertility/infertility experiences.
Aim: To examine the frequency of ovulation monitoring and its relationship with fertility knowledge and experience.
Method: A cross-sectional study of women aged 25-50 years resident in southern New Zealand was undertaken in 2011. Randomly selected women were asked to complete a fertility questionnaire. Outcome prevalence measures were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and associations investigated using χ2 tests and Poisson regression.
Results: Ovulation monitoring was common, having ever been undertaken by 31.4% (95% CI: 28.5-34.3%) of the 1034 participants. However, knowledge was poor, particularly regarding the fertile window. More women who had ever monitored ovulation correctly identified the fertile window, although the proportion was still very low (18.4 vs 13.1% in those who had not, P = 0.027). Regression modelling showed ovulation monitoring was independently associated with seeking medical help to conceive, education and fertility experience, but not with knowledge.
Conclusion: This study confirms ovulation monitoring was commonly undertaken. However, many women, including those who had monitored their ovulation, had poor fertility knowledge and failed to identify the fertile window. Poor fertility knowledge needs to be addressed, especially among women intending to conceive.
Keywords: fertile window; infertility; knowledge; ovulation monitoring.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive.Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):749-54. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.681638. Epub 2012 Apr 18. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012. PMID: 22462529
-
Women's experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis.Reprod Health. 2015 Dec 21;12:116. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0103-y. Reprod Health. 2015. PMID: 26689590 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Self-identification of the clinical fertile window and the ovulation period.Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1319-25.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 25724738
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
An Integrative Review of Fertility Knowledge and Fertility-Awareness Practices Among Women Trying to Conceive.Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Jun;25(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 5. Nurs Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 33961806 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge of the ovulatory cycle and its determinants among women of childbearing age in Haiti: a population-based study using the 2016/2017 Haitian Demographic Health Survey.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jan 2;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02136-8. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36593445 Free PMC article.
-
A Pilot Qualitative Case Study of Women's Experiences with Fertility Awareness-Based Methods.Linacre Q. 2023 Feb;90(1):82-93. doi: 10.1177/00243639221133609. Epub 2022 Nov 16. Linacre Q. 2023. PMID: 36923682 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility Health Knowledge in U.S. Adults: Men Narrowing the Knowledge Gap.Am J Mens Health. 2022 Sep-Oct;16(5):15579883221117915. doi: 10.1177/15579883221117915. Am J Mens Health. 2022. PMID: 36112813 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources