Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):226.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2165-8.

Where's the evidence? a systematic review of economic analyses of residential aged care infrastructure

Tiffany Easton  1   2   3 , Rachel Milte  4   5   6 , Maria Crotty  4   5 , Julie Ratcliffe  4   6
Affiliations

Where's the evidence? a systematic review of economic analyses of residential aged care infrastructure

Tiffany Easton et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Residential care infrastructure, in terms of the characteristics of the organisation (such as proprietary status, size, and location) and the physical environment, have been found to directly influence resident outcomes. This review aimed to summarise the existing literature of economic evaluations of residential care infrastructure.

Methods: A systematic review of English language articles using AgeLine, CINAHL, Econlit, Informit (databases in Health; Business and Law; Social Sciences), Medline, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science with retrieval up to 14 December 2015. The search strategy combined terms relating to nursing homes, economics, and older people. Full economic evaluations, partial economic evaluations, and randomised trials reporting more limited economic information, such as estimates of resource use or costs of interventions were included. Data was extracted using predefined data fields and synthesized in a narrative summary to address the stated review objective.

Results: Fourteen studies containing an economic component were identified. None of the identified studies attempted to systematically link costs and outcomes in the form of a cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, or cost-utility analysis. There was a wide variation in approaches taken for valuing the outcomes associated with differential residential care infrastructures: 8 studies utilized various clinical outcomes as proxies for the quality of care provided, and 2 focused on resident outcomes including agitation, quality of life, and the quality of care interactions. Only 2 studies included residents living with dementia.

Conclusions: Robust economic evidence is needed to inform aged care facility design. Future research should focus on identifying appropriate and meaningful outcome measures that can be used at a service planning level, as well as the broader health benefits and cost-saving potential of different organisational and environmental characteristics in residential care.

Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42015015977 .

Keywords: Ageing; Economic evaluation; Infrastructure; Long-term care; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. OECD . Sizing up the challenge ahead: future demographic trends and long-term care costs. 2011.
    1. OECD . Can we get better value for money in Long-term Care? 2011.
    1. Dobner S, Musterd S, Droogleever Fortuijn J. ‘Ageing in place’: experiences of older adults in Amsterdam and Portland. Geophys J R Astron Soc. 2016;81(2):197–209.
    1. Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of "smart home" applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008;2008:33–40. - PubMed
    1. Kamp BJ, Wellman NS, Russell C. Position of the American Dietetic Association, American Society for Nutrition, and Society for Nutrition Education: Food and nutrition programs for community-residing older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(3):463–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.12.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types