Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Mar;96(12):e6362.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006362.

Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis

Affiliations
Observational Study

Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis

Seung Hyun Cho et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Recently, a few studies have raised the question of whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) is essential for all T3 rectal cancers. This case-matched study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of surgery alone with those of PCRT + surgery for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed T3ab (extramural depth of invasion ≤5 mm) and absent mesorectal fascia invasion (clear MRF) in mid/lower rectal cancer patients.From January 2006 to November 2012, 203 patients who underwent curative surgery alone (n = 118) or PCRT + surgery (n = 85) were enrolled in this retrospective study. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to eliminate the inherent bias. Case-matching covariates included age, sex, body mass index, histologic grade, carcinoembryonic antigen, operation method, follow-up period, tumor height, and status of lymph node metastasis. The end-points were the 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate and disease-free-survival (DFS).After propensity score matching, 140 patients in 70 pairs were included. Neither the 5-year LR rate nor the DFS was significantly different between the 2 groups (the 5-year LR rate, P = 0.93; the 5-year DFS, P = 0.94). The 5-year LR rate of the surgery alone was 2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2%-10.9%) versus 2% (95% CI 0.2%-10.1%) in the PCRT + surgery group. The 5-year DFS of the surgery alone was 87% (95% CI 74.6%-93.7%) versus 88% (95% CI 77.8%-93.9%) in the PCRT + surgery group.In patients with MRI-assessed T3ab and clear MRF mid/lower rectal cancer, the long-term outcomes of surgery alone were comparable with those of the PCRT + surgery. The suggested MRI-assessed T3ab and clear MRF can be used as a highly selective indication of surgery alone in mid/lower T3 rectal cancer. Additionally, in those patients, surgery alone can be tailored to the clinical situation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study cohort enrollment. AV = anal verge, BMI = body mass index, CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen, F/U = follow-up, LN = lymph node, MRF = mesorectal fascia, OP = operation, PCRT = preoperative chemoradiotherapy, Tx = treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the 5-year LR rate and DFS in the unmatched and matched study cohort. (A, B) unmatched cohort (n = 203). Neither the 5-year LR rate nor the DFS was significantly different between the 2 groups (the 5-year LR rate, P = 0.40; the 5-year DFS, P = 0.23). (C, D) matched cohort (n = 140). Neither the 5-year LR rate nor the DFS was significantly different between the groups (the 5-year LR rate, P = 0.93; the 5-year DFS, P = 0.94). DFS = disease-free survival, LR = local recurrence, PCRT = preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

References

    1. NCCN. Practice guideline in diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer. National Cancer Comprehensive Network, 2013. Available at www.nccn.org.
    1. IKNL Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland. Dutch Guidelines Rectal Cancer, 2011. Available at www.oncoline.nl.
    1. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann oncol 2012;23:2479–516. - PubMed
    1. NICE. NICE clinical guideline 131. The diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer, 2011. Available at http://guidance. nice.org.uk/cg131.
    1. Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J, et al. International preoperative rectal cancer management: staging, neoadjuvant treatment, and impact of multidisciplinary teams. World J Surg 2010;34:2689–700. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms