Infection of cattle by airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus: minimal doses with O1 and SAT 2 strains
- PMID: 2832913
Infection of cattle by airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus: minimal doses with O1 and SAT 2 strains
Abstract
Equipment has been constructed and methods developed for exposing individual cattle to two strains of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus in aerosols to determine the minimal infective dose by the respiratory route. The aerosols used were produced either artificially by a spinning-top aerosol generator, in which case they were of homogeneous small particle size (less than 3 micron in diameter) or else they were derived naturally from infected pigs, in which case the particles were heterogeneous in size. Two strains of FMD virus were used: an O1 strain of UK origin and a SAT 2 strain from South Africa. The lowest doses which initiated infection were 12.5 TCID50 of O1 BFS virus and 25 TCID50 of SAT 2 virus, infectivity having been assayed in primary bovine thyroid cell cultures. Following exposure to low doses of virus (range 12 to 316 TCID50) 33 per cent of the cattle exposed to O1 BFS virus and 27 per cent exposed to SAT 2 virus were infected but did not develop detectable vesicular lesions.
Similar articles
-
Foot-and-mouth disease: a review of intranasal infection of cattle, sheep and pigs.Vet J. 2008 Aug;177(2):159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 May 16. Vet J. 2008. PMID: 17509917 Review.
-
Exposure of sheep to natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus.Res Vet Sci. 1986 Jul;41(1):45-9. Res Vet Sci. 1986. PMID: 3020658
-
Sites of release of airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected pigs.Res Vet Sci. 1980 Nov;29(3):315-9. Res Vet Sci. 1980. PMID: 6265993
-
The airborne dispersal of foot-and-mouth disease virus from vaccinated and recovered pigs, cattle and sheep after exposure to infection.Res Vet Sci. 1977 Jul;23(1):70-5. Res Vet Sci. 1977. PMID: 198862
-
Differential significance of epizootiological factors in the control of foot-and-mouth disease. A brief review.Acta Virol. 1983 Jul;27(4):371-5. Acta Virol. 1983. PMID: 6139000 Review.
Cited by
-
Topographic determinants of foot and mouth disease transmission in the UK 2001 epidemic.BMC Vet Res. 2006 Jan 16;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-2-3. BMC Vet Res. 2006. PMID: 16412245 Free PMC article.
-
Airborne Microorganisms From Livestock Production Systems and Their Relation to Dust.Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Apr 16;44(10):1071-1128. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2012.746064. eCollection 2014. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 32288664 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling the Transmission of Foot and Mouth Disease to Inform Transportation of Infected Carcasses to a Disposal Site During an Outbreak Event.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 14;6:501. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00501. eCollection 2019. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 31993448 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of a sampling system for recovery and detection of airborne porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and swine influenza virus.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):4811-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00472-06. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16820475 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth-disease virus.Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Mar;9(2):153-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Nov 28. Infect Genet Evol. 2009. PMID: 19100342 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials