Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):974-982.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx008.

Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register

Owen Bebb et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the application of the European Society of Cardiology Acute Cardiovascular Care Association quality indicators (QI) for acute myocardial infarction for the study of hospital performance and 30-day mortality.

Methods and results: National cohort study (n = 118,075 patients, n = 211 hospitals, MINAP registry), 2012-13. Overall, 16 of the 20 QIs could be calculated. Eleven QIs had a significant inverse association with GRACE risk adjusted 30-day mortality (all P < 0.005). The association with the greatest magnitude was high attainment of the composite opportunity-based QI (80-100%) vs. zero attainment (odds ratio 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.05, P < 0.001), increasing attainment from low (0.42, 0.37- 0.49, P < 0.001) to intermediate (0.15, 0.13-0.16, P < 0.001) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of 30-day mortality. A 1% increase in attainment of this QI was associated with a 3% reduction in 30-day mortality (0.97, 0.97-0.97, P < 0.001). The QI with the widest hospital variation was 'fondaparinux received among NSTEMI' (interquartile range 84.7%) and least variation 'centre organisation' (0.0%), with seven QIs depicting minimal variation (<11%). GRACE risk score adjusted 30-day mortality varied by hospital (median 6.7%, interquartile range 5.4-7.9%).

Conclusions: Eleven QIs were significantly inversely associated with 30-day mortality. Increasing patient attainment of the composite quality indicator was the most powerful predictor; a 1% increase in attainment represented a 3% decrease in 30-day standardised mortality. The ESC QIs for acute myocardial infarction are applicable in a large health system and have the potential to improve care and reduce unwarranted variation in death from acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Hospital performance; Mortality; Quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of hospitals’ performance according to the European Society Cardiology; Acute Cardiovascular Care Association quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Caterpillar plot of hospital rank of hospital mean unadjusted and mean GRACE risk score adjusted hospital 30-day mortality rates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter matrix of European Society Cardiology; Acute Cardiovascular Care Association quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction showing pairwise correlations of all quality indicator pairs, presented alongside Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (where * indicates P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between the European Society Cardiology; Acute Cardiovascular Care Association quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction and crude 30-day mortality. The composite opportunity QI was divided into the following categories: zero–received no interventions out of those eligible for, low–received <40% of interventions eligible for, intermediate–received ≥40 to <80% of interventions eligible for and high–received ≥80% of interventions eligible for.

References

    1. Smith FG, Brogan RA, Alabas O, Laut KG, Quinn T, Bugiardini R, Gale CP.. Comparative care and outcomes for acute coronary syndromes in Central and Eastern European transitional countries: a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2014;4:537–554. - PubMed
    1. Rapsomaniki E, Thuresson M, Yang E, Blin P, Hunt P, Chung S-C, Stogiannis D, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Timmis A, Denaxas SC.. Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2016;2:172–183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung SC, Sundstrom J, Gale CP, James S, Deanfield J, Wallentin L, Timmis A, Jernberg T, Hemingway H.. Comparison of hospital variation in acute myocardial infarction care and outcome between Sweden and United Kingdom: population based cohort study using nationwide clinical registries. BMJ 2015;351:h3913.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiele F, Gale CP, Bonnefoy E, Capuano F, Claeys MJ, Danchin N, Fox KA, Huber K, Iakobishvili Z, Lettino M.. Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2016; doi 10.1177/2048872616643053. - PubMed
    1. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F.. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2569–2619. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances