Long-term outcome after a treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
- PMID: 28329410
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30646
Long-term outcome after a treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, post-HCT relapse and regimen-related toxicity remain significant barriers to long-term survival. In recent years, new conditioning regimens have been explored to improve transplantation outcomes in patients with AML. Treosulfan combines a potent immunosuppressive and antileukemic effect with a low toxicity profile.
Methods: To investigate the role of treosulfan-based conditioning, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party performed a registry analysis of 520 adult patients with AML who received treosulfan-based conditioning and underwent HCT between 2000 and 2012, including 225 patients in first complete remission, 107 in second or later complete remission, and 188 with active/advanced disease 188 (88 with primary refractory disease). The median patient age was 57 years (range, 20-73 years). Donors were human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings (n = 187), unrelated donors (n = 235), or mismatched related donors (n = 98). Conditioning regimens included treosulfan (42 g/m2 [n = 396], 36 g/m2 [n = 109], or 30 g/ m2 [n = 15]) with fludarabine or alkylating agents followed by infusion of hematopoietic stem cells (bone marrow, n = 52; peripheral blood, n = 468).
Results: At a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival, relapse incidence, and nonrelapse mortality rates were 38%, 33%, 42%, and 25%, respectively. The incidence of grade II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 24% (grade III-V, 11%) and 38%, respectively. Only 11 patients (2%) developed veno-occlusive disease, with two deaths (0.4%) from veno-occlusive disease.
Conclusions: Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens provide an acceptable long-term survival with favorable nonrelapse mortality and a very low risk of veno-occlusive disease. Further studies are needed to optimize the treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for patients with AML. Cancer 2017;123:2671-79. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; allogeneic stem cell transplantation; conditioning regimen; graft-versus leukemia effect; toxicity; treosulfan.
© 2017 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Treosulfan, fludarabine, and 2-Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Apr;20(4):549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24440648 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Analysis of Treosulfan Conditioning Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Hematological Malignancies.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Jan;63(1):139-48. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25764. Epub 2015 Sep 23. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26398915
-
Intravenous Busulfan Compared with Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;24(4):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.776. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29247780 Clinical Trial.
-
Treosulfan-based conditioning before hematopoietic SCT: more than a BU look-alike.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan;47(1):5-14. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.88. Epub 2011 Apr 11. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012. PMID: 21478921 Review.
-
Peripheral blood stem cell versus bone marrow transplantation: A perspective from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Exp Hematol. 2016 Jul;44(7):567-73. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Exp Hematol. 2016. PMID: 27106798 Review.
Cited by
-
Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 May;59(5):670-679. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02241-2. Epub 2024 Feb 21. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38383713 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Conditioning Regimens for Frail Patients with Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: How to Strike Gently.Clin Hematol Int. 2021 Aug 19;3(4):153-160. doi: 10.2991/chi.k.210731.001. eCollection 2021 Dec. Clin Hematol Int. 2021. PMID: 34938987 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Determinants of Interpatient Variability in Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics in AML Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 27;25(15):8215. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158215. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39125785 Free PMC article.
-
Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 10;9:775485. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.775485. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34956984 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;148(10):2599-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8. Epub 2021 Oct 21. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34674031 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical