Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jun;6(1):72.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0395-9. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

An overview of physico-chemical mechanisms of biogas production by microbial communities: a step towards sustainable waste management

Affiliations
Review

An overview of physico-chemical mechanisms of biogas production by microbial communities: a step towards sustainable waste management

Ramansu Goswami et al. 3 Biotech. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Biogas is a combination of methane, CO2, nitrogen, H2S and traces of few other gases. Almost any organic waste can be biologically transformed into biogas and other energy-rich organic compounds through the process of anaerobic digestion (AD) and thus helping in sustainable waste management. Although microbes are involved in each step of AD, knowledge about those microbial consortia is limited due to the lack of phylogenetic and metabolic data of predominantly unculturable microorganisms. However, culture-independent methods like PCR-based ribotyping has been successfully employed to get information about the microbial consortia involved in AD. Microbes identified have been found to belong mainly to the bacterial phyla of Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Among the archaeal population, the majority have been found to be methanogens (mainly unculturable), the remaining being thermophilic microbes. Thus, the AD process as a whole could be controlled by regulating the microbial consortia involved in it. Optimization in the feedstock, pH, temperature and other physical parameters would be beneficial for the microbial growth and viability and thus helpful for biogas production in AD. Besides, the biogas production is also dependent upon the activity of several key genes, ion-specific transporters and enzymes, like genes coding for methyl-CoM reductase, formylmethanofuran transferase, formate dehydrogenase present in the microbes. Fishing for these high-efficiency genes will ultimately increase the biogas production and sustain the production plant.

Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Key genes; Microbial community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Carbon flow inside the anaerobic digester and bacteria involved in different stages of anaerobic digestion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Biochemical pathways to produce CH4 from different starting material during AD. a Methylotrophic methanogenesis. b Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. c Acetotrophic methanogenesis. MF, methanofuran; CHO-MF, formylmethanofuran; Fdred2−, reduced ferrodoxin; Fdox, oxidized ferredoxin; FDM (W/Mo-FMD), (tungsten/molybdenum-dependent) formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase; H4MPT, tetrahydromethanopterin; FTR, Formylmethanofuran: tetrahydromethanopterin formyltransferase; CHO–H4SPT, formylmethanofuran; MCH, N 5,N 10-methenyl tetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolases; CH≡H4SPT+, methenyl tetrahydromethanopterin; F420H2, reduced cofactor F420; MTD, coenzyme F420-dependent N 5,N 10-methylene tetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase; CH2=H4SPT, methylene tetrahydromethanopterin; MER, N 5,N 10-methylene tetrahydromethanopterin reductase; CH3–H4SPT, methyl tetrahydromethanopterin; CoM–SH, coenzyme M; MTR, N 5-methyl tetrahydromethanopterin: Coenzyme M methyltransferase; CH3–S–CoM, methyl coenzyme M; CoB–SH, coenzyme B; MCR, methyl coenzyme M reductase; CoM–S–S–CoB, coenzyme M-HTP heterodisulfide
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic representation of different bioreactors

References

    1. Aguena M, Spira B. Transcriptional processing of the pst operon of Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol. 2009;58:264–267. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9319-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berni M, Dorileo I, Nathia G, Forster-Carneiro T, Lachos D, Santos BGM. Anaerobic digestion and biogas production: combine effluent treatment with energy generation in UASB reactor as biorefinery annex. Int J Chem Eng. 2014
    1. Bowker RPG. New wastewater treatment for industrial applications. Environ Prog. 1983;2:235–242. doi: 10.1002/ep.670020408. - DOI
    1. Buffieare P, Bergeon JP, Moletta R. The inverse turbulent bed: a novel bioreactor for anaerobic treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:673–677. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00166-9. - DOI
    1. Chae KJ, Jang A, Yim SK, Kim IS. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresour Technol . 2008;99:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.063. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources