Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Dec;76(12):1980-1985.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210758. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

Comparison of performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome with other sets of criteria in Japanese patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome with other sets of criteria in Japanese patients

Hiroto Tsuboi et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the performance of the new 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) with 1999 revised Japanese Ministry of Health criteria for diagnosis of SS (JPN), 2002 American-European Consensus Group classification criteria for SS (AECG) and 2012 ACR classification criteria for SS (ACR) in Japanese patients.

Methods: The study subjects were 499 patients with primary SS (pSS) or suspected pSS who were followed up in June 2012 at 10 hospitals in Japan. All patients had been assessed for all four criteria of JPN (pathology, oral, ocular, anti-SS-A/SS-B antibodies). The clinical diagnosis by the physician in charge was set as the 'gold standard'.

Results: pSS was diagnosed in 302 patients and ruled out in 197 patients by the physician in charge. The sensitivity of the ACR-EULAR criteria in the diagnosis of pSS (95.4%) was higher than those of the JPN, AECG and ACR (82.1%, 89.4% and 79.1%, respectively), while the specificity of the ACR-EULAR (72.1%) was lower than those of the three sets (90.9%, 84.3% and 84.8%, respectively). The differences of sensitivities and specificities between the ACR-EULAR and other three sets of criteria were statistically significant (p<0.001). Eight out of 302 patients with pSS and 11 cases out of 197 non-pSS cases satisfied only the ACR-EULAR criteria, compared with none of the other three sets.

Conclusions: The ACR-EULAR criteria had significantly higher sensitivity and lower specificity in diagnosis of pSS, compared with the currently available three sets of criteria.

Keywords: Autoimmune Diseases; Epidemiology; Sjøgren's Syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Satisfaction for each item adopted in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for pSS (ACR-EULAR) among 19 cases that satisfied only the ACR-EULAR criteria. (A) Eight patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) who only satisfied the ACR-EULAR criteria had positive Focus Score (FS) (62.5%, 5/8 cases) or pSS-A/Ro (37.5%, 3/8 cases), together with decreased salivary (87.5%, 7/8 cases) or lacrimal (12.5%, 1/8 cases) secretion, resulting in Total Score 4. (B) Eleven non-pSS cases who only satisfied the ACR-EULAR criteria had positive FS (54.5%, 6/11 cases) or positive SS-A/Ro (45.5%, 5/11 cases), together with decreased salivary secretion (100%, 11/11 cases), resulting in Total Score 4. White boxes: non-satisfaction, shadowed boxes: satisfaction (dark shadow: 3 points, light shadow: 1 point). FS-LSG, FS ≥1 foci/4 mm2 in labial salivary gland; SS-A/Ro, positive anti-SS-A/Ro antibody; Ocular staining, Van Bijsterveld Score ≥4 in Rose Bengal test, lissamine green test or fluorescein staining test; Schirmer, Schirmer's test ≤5 mm/5 min; Saliva, unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) ≤0.1 mL/min, gum test ≤10 mL/10 min or Saxon test ≤2 g/2 min.

Comment in

References

    1. Tsuboi H, Asashima H, Takai C, et al. . Primary and secondary surveys on epidemiology of Sjögren's syndrome in Japan. Mod Rheumatol 2014;24:464–70. 10.3109/14397595.2013.843765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. . Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:554–8. 10.1136/ard.61.6.554 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fujibayashi T, Sugai S, Miyasaka N, et al. . Revised Japanese criteria for Sjögren's syndrome (1999): availability and validity. Mod Rheumatol 2004;14:425–34. 10.3109/s10165-004-0338-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH, Criswell L, et al. . American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:475–87. 10.1002/acr.21591 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsuboi H, Hagiwara S, Asashima H, et al. . Validation of different sets of criteria for the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome in Japanese patients. Mod Rheumatol 2013;23:219–25. 10.1007/s10165-012-0812-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types