Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 1;32(5):969-973.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex056.

Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring

Affiliations
Free article

Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring

Guido Pennings. Hum Reprod. .
Free article

Abstract

The matter of disclosure of donor conception to donor offspring is a very contentious issue. A frequently mentioned argument is that disclosure is in the best interest of the child. The objectives of this paper are 2-fold: first, to find out whether there are any measureable, stable differences in the psychological well-being of donor offspring who are informed of the mode of their conception compared to those who are not, and second, to find out what is being done with the evidence. We found that there exists no empirical evidence of differences in psychological well-being of donor offspring in disclosing or nondisclosing families. Regarding the age of disclosure, the findings are inconclusive. Some studies indicate no difference and some show slight positive effects of early disclosure. We also found that authors tend to ignore their own findings when formulating recommendations and that the recommendations are based on implicit moral premises. We conclude that disclosure, and directive counseling towards disclosure, cannot be justified by the welfare of the donor offspring.

Keywords: disclosure; donor conception; donor offspring; ethics; gamete donation; secrets; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Reply: disclosure and donor-conceived children.
    Pennings G. Pennings G. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1537-1538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex108. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28541402 No abstract available.
  • Donor-conceived children: the view ahead.
    Pasch LA, Benward J, Scheib JE, Woodward JT. Pasch LA, et al. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1534. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex105. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28541418 No abstract available.
  • Disclosure and donor-conceived children.
    Crawshaw M, Adams D, Allan S, Blyth E, Bourne K, Brügge C, Chien A, Clissa A, Daniels K, Glazer E, Haase J, Hammarberg K, van Hooff H, Hunt J, Indekeu A, Johnson L, Kim Y, Kirkman M, Kramer W, Lalos A, Lister C, Lowinger P, Mindes E, Monach J, Montuschi O, Pike S, Powell V, Rodino I, Ruby A, Margriet Schrijvers A, Semba Y, Shidlo R, Thorn P, Tonkin L, Visser M, Woodward J, Wischmann T, Yee S, Zweifel JE. Crawshaw M, et al. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1535-1536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex107. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28549124 No abstract available.
  • Disclosure and donor-conceived children.
    Golombok S. Golombok S. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1532-1536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex104. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28549127 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources