Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 1;18(3):495-504.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx004.

Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction

Jing Ning  1 , Yong Chen  2 , Jin Piao  3
Affiliations

Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction

Jing Ning et al. Biostatistics. .

Abstract

Publication bias occurs when the published research results are systematically unrepresentative of the population of studies that have been conducted, and is a potential threat to meaningful meta-analysis. The Copas selection model provides a flexible framework for correcting estimates and offers considerable insight into the publication bias. However, maximizing the observed likelihood under the Copas selection model is challenging because the observed data contain very little information on the latent variable. In this article, we study a Copas-like selection model and propose an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for estimation based on the full likelihood. Empirical simulation studies show that the EM algorithm and its associated inferential procedure performs well and avoids the non-convergence problem when maximizing the observed likelihood.

Keywords: Copas Model; EM algorithm; Meta-analysis; Publication Bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Funnel plot for the second-hand smoke data based on 37 studies (Hackshaw and others, 1997).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baker R. and Jackson D. (2006). Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies. Biometrics 62, 785–792. - PubMed
    1. Begg C. B. and Mazumdar M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50, 1088–1101. - PubMed
    1. Bürkner P. C. and Doebler P. (2014). Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Statistics in Medicine 33, 3061–3077. - PubMed
    1. Carpenter J. R., Schwarzer G., Rücker G. and Künstler R. (2009). Empirical evaluation showed that the copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62, 624–631. - PubMed
    1. Copas J. (1999). What works? Selectivity models and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 162, 95–109.