Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;361(2):280-291.
doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.239061. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Pharmacologic Profile of Naloxegol, a Peripherally Acting µ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist, for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation

Affiliations

Pharmacologic Profile of Naloxegol, a Peripherally Acting µ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist, for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation

Eike Floettmann et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017 May.

Abstract

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common side effect of opioid pharmacotherapy for the management of pain because opioid agonists bind to µ-opioid receptors in the enteric nervous system (ENS). Naloxegol, a polyethylene glycol derivative of naloxol, which is a derivative of naloxone and a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, targets the physiologic mechanisms that cause OIC. Pharmacologic measures of opioid activity and pharmacokinetic measures of central nervous system (CNS) penetration were employed to characterize the mechanism of action of naloxegol. At the human µ-opioid receptor in vitro, naloxegol was a potent inhibitor of binding (Ki = 7.42 nM) and a neutral competitive antagonist (pA2 - 7.95); agonist effects were <10% up to 30 μM and identical to those of naloxone. The oral doses achieving 50% of the maximal effect in the rat for antagonism of morphine-induced inhibition of gastrointestinal transit and morphine-induced antinociception in the hot plate assay were 23.1 and 55.4 mg/kg for naloxegol and 0.69 and 1.14 mg/kg by for naloxone, respectively. In the human colon adenocarcinoma cell transport assay, naloxegol was a substrate for the P-glycoprotein transporter, with low apparent permeability in the apical to basolateral direction, and penetrated the CNS 15-fold slower than naloxone in a rat brain perfusion model. Naloxegol-derived radioactivity was poorly distributed throughout the rat CNS and was eliminated from most tissues within 24 hours. These findings corroborate phase 3 clinical studies demonstrating that naloxegol relieves OIC-associated symptoms in patients with chronic noncancer pain by antagonizing the µ-opioid receptor in the ENS while preserving CNS-mediated analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Chemical structure of naloxegol, a PEGylated derivative of naloxol, which is derived from naloxone. The box encompasses the low molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) chain that is covalently bound to the morphinan ring-based structure of naloxone.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Competitive antagonism of naloxegol at the human µ-opioid receptor. The effects of 3 different concentrations of naloxegol (A) and methylnaltrexone (B) on morphine agonist concentration-response curves, as measured by guanosine 5-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS binding) (1 of 3 independent experiments) are shown. Each compound elicited a rightward shift in the morphine concentration-response curve with no reduction in Emax.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Naloxegol is a competitive neutral antagonist of morphine at the human µ-opioid receptor. This Schild plot depicts the effects of naloxegol (♦) and methylnaltrexone (▪) on morphine agonist concentration-response curves at the human µ-opioid receptor, as measured by [35S]GTPγS binding (pooled results of 3 independent experiments for each compound). Note the respective Schild slopes: –1.03 for naloxegol and –0.982 for methylnaltrexone. DR, dose ratio.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Quantitative whole body autoradiogram of sections through a male pigmented rat at 1 hour after the administration of a single oral dose of [14C]naloxegol (50 mg/kg). Note the absence of radioactivity in the brain.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Predicted plasma concentration-time profile for oral naloxegol 25 mg. At this maximum clinically approved dose, naloxegol exposure is predicted to be insufficient to antagonize the δ-opioid receptor. The light blue area represents the 90% confidence interval (N = 500 simulations from phase 3 studies).

References

    1. Al-Huniti N, Chapel S, Xu H, Bui KH, Sostek M. (2016) Population pharmacokinetics of naloxegol in a population of 1247 healthy subjects and patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 81:89–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beattie DT, Cheruvu M, Mai N, O’Keefe M, Johnson-Rabidoux S, Peterson C, Kaufman E, Vickery R. (2007) The in vitro pharmacology of the peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonists, alvimopan, ADL 08-0011 and methylnaltrexone. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 375:205–220. - PubMed
    1. Bell T, Annunziata K, Leslie JB. (2009a) Opioid-induced constipation negatively impacts pain management, productivity, and health-related quality of life: findings from the National Health and Wellness Survey. J Opioid Manag 5:137–144. - PubMed
    1. Bell TJ, Panchal SJ, Miaskowski C, Bolge SC, Milanova T, Williamson R. (2009b) The prevalence, severity, and impact of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: results of a US and European Patient Survey (PROBE 1). Pain Med 10:35–42. - PubMed
    1. Brown DR, Robertson MJ, Goldberg LI. (1983) Reversal of morphine-induced catalepsy in the rat by narcotic antagonists and their quaternary derivatives. Neuropharmacology 22:317–321. - PubMed

MeSH terms