Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 22;7(3):e013508.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013508.

Single-stage osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower limb amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 (OGAAP-2) for a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Single-stage osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower limb amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 (OGAAP-2) for a prospective cohort study

Munjed Al Muderis et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Lower limb amputations have detrimental influences on the quality of life, function and body image of the affected patients. Following amputation, prolonged rehabilitation is required for patients to be fitted with traditional socket prostheses, and many patients experience symptomatic socket-residuum interface problems which lead to reduced prosthetic use and quality of life. Osseointegration has recently emerged as a novel approach for the reconstruction of amputated limbs, which overcomes many of the socket-related problems by directly attaching the prosthesis to the skeletal residuum. To date, the vast majority of osseointegration procedures worldwide have been performed in 2 stages, which require at least 4 months and up to 18 months for the completion of reconstruction and rehabilitation from the time of the initial surgery. The current prospective cohort study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single-stage osseointegration procedure performed under the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 (OGAAP-2), which dramatically reduces the time of recovery to ∼3-6 weeks.

Methods and analysis: The inclusion criteria for osseointegrated reconstruction under the OGAAP-2 procedure are age over 18 years, unilateral transfemoral amputation and experiencing problems or difficulties in using socket prostheses. All patients receive osseointegrated implants which are press-fitted into the residual bone. Functional and quality-of-life outcome measures are recorded preoperatively and at defined postoperative follow-up intervals up to 2 years. Postoperative adverse events are also recorded. The preoperative and postoperative values are compared for each outcome measure, and the benefits and harms of the single-stage OGAAP-2 procedure will be compared with the results obtained using a previously employed 2-stage procedure.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has received ethics approval from the University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia (014153S). The study outcomes will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed academic journals and presentations at relevant clinical and orthopaedic conferences.

Keywords: Lower limb amputees; Osseointegration; Single-stage surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MAM receives royalties for design contributions for the Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb (OPL; Permedica s.p.a; Milan, Italy) implant system.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the single-stage Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 clinical programme and outcomes evaluation for the osseointegrated reconstruction of lower limb amputations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb implant system (Permedica s.p.a; Milan, Italy) used for the osseointegrated reconstruction of trans-femoral amputations under the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2 procedure. The implant consists of an intramedullary stem component and a dual-cone adaptor component.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Steps involved in single-stage osseointegration surgery under the Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-2. (A) Identification and terminalisation of neuromas during soft tissue preparation. (B) Completed guillotine amputation of the stump. (C) Reaming of the medullary canal and preparation of the distal femur to accommodate the flange of the intramedullary stem component of the osseointegration implant. (D) Insertion of the intramedullary stem by impacting with a mallet. (E) Creation of the stoma site and insertion of the dual-cone adaptor component of the osseointegration implant. (F) Stoma site postoperation, showing the inserted dual-cone adaptor and remaining parts of the abutment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ephraim PL, MacKenzie EJ, Wegener ST et al. . Environmental barriers experienced by amputees: the craig hospital inventory of environmental factors-short form. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:328–33. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagberg K, Brånemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25:186–94. 10.1080/03093640108726601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Livingston DH, Keenan D, Kim D et al. . Extent of disability following traumatic extremity amputation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1994;37:495–9. 10.1097/00005373-199409000-00027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Senra H, Oliveira RA, Leal I et al. . Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:180–91. 10.1177/0269215511410731 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ploeg AJ, Lardenoye JW, Vrancken Peeters MPFM et al. . Contemporary series of morbidity and mortality after lower limb amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:633–7. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.02.014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources