Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Mar 22;7(3):e013753.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013753.

Differences between determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs for patients with acute heart failure: a nationwide observational study from Japan

Affiliations
Observational Study

Differences between determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs for patients with acute heart failure: a nationwide observational study from Japan

Noriko Sasaki et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Although current case-mix classifications in prospective payment systems were developed to estimate patient resource usage, whether these classifications reflect clinical outcomes remains unknown. The efficient management of acute heart failure (AHF) with high mortality is becoming more important in many countries as its prevalence and associated costs are rapidly increasing. Here, we investigate the determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs to clarify the impact of severity factors on these outcomes in patients with AHF, and examine the level of agreement between the predicted values of mortality and costs.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting and participants: A total of 19 926 patients with AHF from 261 acute care hospitals in Japan were analysed using administrative claims data.

Main outcome measures: Multivariable logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to examine the determinants of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs, respectively. The independent variables were grouped into patient condition on admission, postadmission procedures indicating disease severity (eg, intra-aortic balloon pumping) and other high-cost procedures (eg, single-photon emission CT). These groups of independent variables were cumulatively added to the models, and their effects on the models' abilities to predict the respective outcomes were examined. The level of agreement between the quartiles of predicted mortality and predicted costs was analysed using Cohen's κ coefficient.

Results: In-hospital mortality was associated with patient's condition on admission and severity-indicating procedures (C-statistics 0.870), whereas hospitalisation costs were associated with severity-indicating procedures and high-cost procedures (R2 0.32). There were substantial differences in determinants between the outcomes. In addition, there was no consistent relationship observed (κ=0.016, p<0.0001) between the quartiles of in-hospital mortality and hospitalisation costs.

Conclusions: The determinants of mortality and costs for hospitalised patients with AHF were generally different. Our results indicate that the same case-mix classifications should not be used to predict both these outcomes.

Keywords: Case-mix classification; hospitalization costs; in-hospital mortality; resource utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of patient selection. DPC/PDPS, Diagnosis Procedure Combination Per-Diem Payment System; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the in-hospital mortality (model 2) and the hospitalisation costs (model 3). AF/AFL, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; CA, catecholamine; HT, hypertension; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pumping; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; NYHA class, New York Heart Association functional class; PCPS, percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

References

    1. Cretin S, Worthman LG. Alternative systems for case-mix classification in health care financing. R-3457-HCFA. Prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration, U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The RAND Publication Series. ISBN 0-8330-0763-7 http://www.acove.com/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2008/R3457.pdf
    1. Iezzoni L, ed. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 4th edn. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003.
    1. Rutledge R, Osler T. The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization. J Trauma 1998;45:791–9. 10.1097/00005373-199810000-00032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kongstvedt PR, Goldfield NI, Plocher DW. Using data and provider profiling in medical management. In: Kongstvedt PR, ed. Essentials of managed healthcare. 4th edn. MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2003: 379–418.
    1. Anderson G, Ikegami N. How can Japan's DPC inpatient hospital payment system be strengthened? Lessons from the U.S. Medicare prospective system. A report of the CSIS global health policy center 2011.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources