Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative for Pediatric Procedural Sedation
- PMID: 28337075
- PMCID: PMC5341530
- DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.4
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative for Pediatric Procedural Sedation
Abstract
Objective: This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine as a sedative medication for non-invasive procedural sedation.
Methods: Subjects 6 months to 18 years of age undergoing non-invasive elective procedures were included. Dexmedetomidine (3 mcg/kg) was administered IN 40 minutes before the scheduled procedure time. The IN dexmedetomidine cohort was matched and compared to a cohort of 690 subjects who underwent sedation for similar procedures without the use of dexmedetomidine to evaluate for observed events/interventions and procedural times.
Results: One hundred (92%) of the 109 included subjects were successfully sedated with IN dexmedetomidine. There were no significant differences in the rate of observed events/interventions in comparison to the non-dexmedetomidine cohort. However, the IN dexmedetomidine group had a longer postprocedure sleep time when compared to the non-dexmedetomidine cohort (p < 0.001), which had a significant effect on recovery time (p = 0.024). Also, the dexmedetomidine cohort had longer procedure time and total admit time (p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively).
Conclusions: IN dexmedetomidine may be used for non-invasive pediatric procedural sedation. Subjects receiving IN dexmedetomidine had a similar rate of observed events/interventions as the subjects receiving non-dexmedetomidine sedation, with the exception of sleeping time. Also, patients sedated with IN dexmedetomidine had longer time to discharge, procedure time, and total admit time in comparison to other forms of sedation.
Keywords: Precedex; alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonist; dexmedetomidine; drugs; hypnotic; imidazole; intranasal.
Similar articles
-
Nurse-driven intranasal dexmedetomidine administration as sedation for non-invasive procedures in children: a single centre audit.Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Feb;182(2):899-905. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04722-2. Epub 2022 Dec 15. Eur J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 36517626
-
Comparison of rescue techniques for failed chloral hydrate sedation for magnetic resonance imaging scans--additional chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine.Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Mar;26(3):273-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12824. Epub 2015 Dec 30. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 26714442 Clinical Trial.
-
Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study--a prospective observational study.Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Sep;25(9):891-6. doi: 10.1111/pan.12687. Epub 2015 May 9. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 25959165
-
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in Children, a Suitable Alternative to Chloral Hydrate.Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Apr;19(2):107-111. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0217-5. Paediatr Drugs. 2017. PMID: 28275979 Review.
-
Dexmedetomidine: an updated review.Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Feb;41(2):245-52. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H314. Epub 2007 Feb 13. Ann Pharmacother. 2007. PMID: 17299013 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial.Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):1385-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Eur J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 36658444 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Ketamine as Premedication for Level of Sedation in Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Jun;48(3):215-222. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.45087. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020. PMID: 32551449 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative sedation premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine before dental procedures.J Dent Sci. 2019 Mar;14(1):105-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 19. J Dent Sci. 2019. PMID: 30988889 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Two-center randomized controlled trial comparing oral chloral hydrate and intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine for procedural sedation in children: study protocol.Trials. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07033-x. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36597163 Free PMC article.
-
Dexmedetomidine: What's New for Pediatrics? A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 24;9(9):2724. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092724. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32846947 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tobias J. Sedation of infants and children outside of the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015; 28( 4): 478– 485. - PubMed
-
- Dere K, Sucullu I, Budak ET, . et al. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27( 7): 648– 652. - PubMed
-
- Li BL, Ni J, Huang JX, . et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study: a prospective observational study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015; 25( 9): 891– 896. - PubMed
-
- Surendar M, Pandey R, Saksena A, . et al. A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamin for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014; 38( 3): 255– 261. - PubMed
-
- Tsai CJ, Chu KS, Chen TI, . et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol target-controlled infusion for sedation during fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65( 3): 254– 259. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical