Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Feb;22(1):4-8.
doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.4.

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative for Pediatric Procedural Sedation

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative for Pediatric Procedural Sedation

Natalie Behrle et al. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine as a sedative medication for non-invasive procedural sedation.

Methods: Subjects 6 months to 18 years of age undergoing non-invasive elective procedures were included. Dexmedetomidine (3 mcg/kg) was administered IN 40 minutes before the scheduled procedure time. The IN dexmedetomidine cohort was matched and compared to a cohort of 690 subjects who underwent sedation for similar procedures without the use of dexmedetomidine to evaluate for observed events/interventions and procedural times.

Results: One hundred (92%) of the 109 included subjects were successfully sedated with IN dexmedetomidine. There were no significant differences in the rate of observed events/interventions in comparison to the non-dexmedetomidine cohort. However, the IN dexmedetomidine group had a longer postprocedure sleep time when compared to the non-dexmedetomidine cohort (p < 0.001), which had a significant effect on recovery time (p = 0.024). Also, the dexmedetomidine cohort had longer procedure time and total admit time (p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively).

Conclusions: IN dexmedetomidine may be used for non-invasive pediatric procedural sedation. Subjects receiving IN dexmedetomidine had a similar rate of observed events/interventions as the subjects receiving non-dexmedetomidine sedation, with the exception of sleeping time. Also, patients sedated with IN dexmedetomidine had longer time to discharge, procedure time, and total admit time in comparison to other forms of sedation.

Keywords: Precedex; alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonist; dexmedetomidine; drugs; hypnotic; imidazole; intranasal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tobias J. Sedation of infants and children outside of the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015; 28( 4): 478– 485. - PubMed
    1. Dere K, Sucullu I, Budak ET, . et al. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27( 7): 648– 652. - PubMed
    1. Li BL, Ni J, Huang JX, . et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing transthoracic echocardiography study: a prospective observational study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015; 25( 9): 891– 896. - PubMed
    1. Surendar M, Pandey R, Saksena A, . et al. A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamin for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014; 38( 3): 255– 261. - PubMed
    1. Tsai CJ, Chu KS, Chen TI, . et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol target-controlled infusion for sedation during fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65( 3): 254– 259. - PubMed