Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;17(4):20.
doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0690-5.

Economics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Affiliations
Review

Economics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Luke Rudmik. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The objective of this article is to provide an updated review of the economic burden of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and discuss how both medical and surgical interventions impact direct and indirect costs related to CRS. By understanding the economics of CRS, clinicians may improve the patient-centeredness of their care and help distinguish between low and high value interventions.

Recent findings: Direct costs related to CRS are primarily driven by outpatient physician visits, prescription medical therapy, and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). CRS produces large indirect costs and these costs often vary based on the severity of the patients CRS-specific QoL impairment. The overall direct cost related to CRS is estimated to range between $10 and $13 billion per year in the USA. The overall indirect cost related to CRS-related losses in work productivity is estimated to be in excess of $20 billion per year. In the appropriate patients with refractory CRS, ESS provides significant reductions in both direct and indirect costs; however, continued medical therapy alone may be a high value intervention in select patients who have lower severity in their baseline QoL and work productivity.

Keywords: Burden of disease; Chronic sinusitis; Cost; Economic; Pharmacoeconomics; Rhinosinusitis; Value of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1590-1 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2015 Sep 1;314(9):926-39 - PubMed
    1. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Sep;3(9):748-54 - PubMed
    1. BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):null - PubMed
    1. Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1011-1016 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources