Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;20(5):1133-1142.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12559. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Patients' views on their decision making during inpatient rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury-A qualitative interview-based study

Anke Scheel-Sailer  1 , Marcel W Post  2   3   4 , Franz Michel  1 , Tatjana Weidmann-Hügle  5   6 , Ruth Baumann Hölzle  5
Affiliations

Patients' views on their decision making during inpatient rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury-A qualitative interview-based study

Anke Scheel-Sailer et al. Health Expect. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Involving patients in decision making is a legal requirement in many countries, associated with better rehabilitation outcomes, but not easily accomplished during initial inpatient rehabilitation after severe trauma. Providing medical treatment according to the principles of shared decision making is challenging as a point in case for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to retrospectively explore the patients' views on their participation in decision making during their first inpatient rehabilitation after onset of SCI, in order to optimize treatment concepts.

Methods: A total of 22 participants with SCI were interviewed in-depth using a semi-structured interview scheme between 6 months and 35 years post-onset. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed with the Mayring method for qualitative content analysis.

Results: Participants experienced a substantially reduced ability to participate in decision making during the early phase after SCI. They perceived physical, psychological and environmental factors to have impacted upon this ability. Patients mentioned regaining their ability to make decisions was an important goal during their first rehabilitation. Receiving adequate information in an understandable and personalized way was a prerequisite to achieve this goal. Other important factors included medical and psychological condition, personal engagement, time and dialogue with peers.

Conclusion: During the initial rehabilitation of patients with SCI, professionals need to deal with the discrepancy between the obligation to respect a patient's autonomy and their diminished ability for decision making.

Keywords: clinical ethics; health communication; legal obligation; personal autonomy; shared decision-making; subacute care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of qualitative analyses from interview to results and discussion in the decision‐making process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Van de Velde D, Bracke P, Van Hove G, Josephsson S, Devisch I, Vanderstraeten G. The illusion and the paradox of being autonomous, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:491‐502. - PubMed
    1. Lindberg C, Fagerström C, Sivberg B, Willman A. Concept analysis: patient autonomy in a caring context. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:2208‐2221. - PubMed
    1. Nussbaum MC. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Vol 3. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
    1. Pally U. Auswirkungen des Erwachsenenschutzgesetzes auf die Behandlung urteilsunfähiger Patienten, Teil 3. Schweizerische Ärztezeitschrift. 2014;95:474‐477.
    1. Pally U. Auswirkungen des Erwachsenenschutzgesetzes auf die Behandlung urteilsunfähiger Patienten, Teil 2. Schweizerische Ärztezeitschrift. 2014;11:427‐428.

Publication types