Efficacy and Safety of Crystalline Valsartan/Sacubitril (LCZ696) Compared With Placebo and Combinations of Free Valsartan and Sacubitril in Patients With Systolic Hypertension: The RATIO Study
- PMID: 28338503
- DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000485
Efficacy and Safety of Crystalline Valsartan/Sacubitril (LCZ696) Compared With Placebo and Combinations of Free Valsartan and Sacubitril in Patients With Systolic Hypertension: The RATIO Study
Abstract
We compared the systolic blood pressure (SBP)-lowering efficacy and safety of crystalline valsartan/sacubitril (LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor) 400 mg daily against valsartan (320 mg once daily) alone or coadministered with placebo or increasing doses of free sacubitril (50, 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily) to identify the optimal antihypertensive combination dose. This multicenter, double-blinded, 7-arm parallel-group study recruited patients with mild-to-moderate systolic hypertension (office SBP 150-179 mm Hg). Primary-dependent variable was change in office SBP from baseline to week 8. At entry (n = 907), mean age was 61.5 years, sitting office BP 160/90.2 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP 142/82.1 mm Hg; 852 participants completed the study. At week 8, there were greater reductions in sitting office SBP and 24-hour ambulatory SBP with LCZ696 400 mg than with valsartan 320 mg (-5.7 and -3.4 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05 each). The SBP reduction with LCZ696 400 daily was similar to coadministered free valsartan 320 mg and sacubitril 200 mg. Effects were similar in those older and younger than 65 years, and active therapies had adverse event rates similar to placebo. We conclude that crystalline valsartan/sacubitril 400 mg daily (1) is superior to valsartan 320 mg daily for lowering SBP, (2) has similar efficacy to the combination of free valsartan 320 mg plus free sacubitril 200 mg, (3) represents the optimal dosage for systolic hypertension in patients of any age, and (4) is safe and well tolerated.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Compared With Olmesartan in Elderly Asian Patients (≥65 Years) With Systolic Hypertension.Am J Hypertens. 2017 Nov 6;30(12):1163-1169. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx111. Am J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28992296 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic Hypertension: The PARAMETER Study.Hypertension. 2017 Mar;69(3):411-420. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08556. Epub 2017 Jan 16. Hypertension. 2017. PMID: 28093466 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with olmesartan in Asian patients with essential hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, 8-week study.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Jan;21(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/jch.13437. Epub 2018 Dec 11. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019. PMID: 30536595 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the PARAGON-HF Trial.JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Jun 26. JACC Heart Fail. 2017. PMID: 28662936 Review.
-
Effects of LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan) on Blood Pressure in Patients with Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiology. 2020;145(9):589-598. doi: 10.1159/000507327. Epub 2020 Jul 29. Cardiology. 2020. PMID: 32726791
Cited by
-
The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 26;10(13):2824. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132824. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34206864 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor as a novel antihypertensive drug: Evidence from Asia and around the globe.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Mar;23(3):556-567. doi: 10.1111/jch.14120. Epub 2020 Dec 11. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021. PMID: 33305531 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sacubitril/valsartan: evaluation of safety and efficacy as an antihypertensive treatment.Drugs Context. 2018 Aug 6;7:212542. doi: 10.7573/dic.212542. eCollection 2018. Drugs Context. 2018. PMID: 30116284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled by olmesartan: A randomized, double-blind, 8-week study.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jan;20(1):150-158. doi: 10.1111/jch.13153. Epub 2018 Jan 16. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018. PMID: 29338113 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Network meta-analysis of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of essential hypertension.Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Jul;112(7):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02120-0. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36326841 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical