Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Jul 15;123(14):2752-2761.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30657. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Quality of life with cediranib in relapsed ovarian cancer: The ICON6 phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Quality of life with cediranib in relapsed ovarian cancer: The ICON6 phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Dan P Stark et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The ICON6 trial showed that cediranib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, improved clinical outcomes for patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer when it was used with chemotherapy and was continued as maintenance therapy. This study describes health-related quality of life (QOL) during the first year of treatment.

Methods: Four hundred fifty-six women were randomly allocated to receive standard chemotherapy only, chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, or chemotherapy with cediranib administered concurrently and continued as maintenance. Patients completed QOL questionnaires until disease progression every 3 weeks during chemotherapy and then every 6 weeks to 1 year. Patients alive with disease progression completed a QOL form 1 year after randomization. The primary QOL endpoint was the global score from the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) at 1 year, with the standard chemotherapy group compared with the concurrent-maintenance cediranib group.

Results: The rate of questionnaire compliance was 90% at the baseline and 76% at 1 year and was similar across the 3 groups. The mean global QOL score at 1 year was 62.6 points for the standard chemotherapy group and 68.7 points for the concurrent-maintenance group (+4.5; 95% confidence interval, -2.0 to 11.0; P = .18). Sensitivity analyses suggested that this finding was robust to the effect of missing data, and the improvement became statistically significant after adjustments for self-reported diarrhea.

Conclusions: The 6th study by the International Collaboration in Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON6) showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival with cediranib as concurrent and maintenance therapy. No QOL detriment with cediranib was found 1 year after treatment was commenced. The maintenance of QOL along with prolonged cancer control suggests that cediranib has a valuable role in the treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer. Cancer 2017;123:2752-61. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: chemotherapy; health-related quality of life; ovarian cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
QOL assessed at key time points. *After progression, the QOL assessment was performed at 12 and 24 months only. QOL indicates quality of life.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean global quality of life in each group, with 95% CIs, over the course of 1 year from study entry. CI indicates confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis of differences in global quality of life. Point estimates with 95% CIs are shown for the differences between the treatment groups (the Cediranib group [C] mean minus the standard chemotherapy group [A] mean); we imputed a range of postprogression global quality‐of‐life values to estimate the potential impact of missing data. The actual difference and 6 imputed scenarios are shown. CI indicates confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, et al. Recommendations for incorporating patient‐reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4249‐4255. - PubMed
    1. Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, et al. Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology value framework: revisions and reflections in response to comments received. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2925‐2934. - PubMed
    1. Folkman J, Merler E, Abernathy C, Williams G. Isolation of a tumor factor responsible for angiogenesis. J Exp Med. 1971;133:275‐288. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor–induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo. Nature. 1993;362:841‐844. - PubMed
    1. Eskander RN, Tewari KS. Incorporation of anti‐angiogenesis therapy in the management of advanced ovarian carcinoma—mechanistics, review of phase III randomized clinical trials, and regulatory implications. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:496‐505. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms