Palliative Care in Surgery: Defining the Research Priorities
- PMID: 28339313
- PMCID: PMC6913794
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0079
Palliative Care in Surgery: Defining the Research Priorities
Abstract
Given the acute and often life-limiting nature of surgical illness, as well as the potential for treatment to induce further suffering, surgical patients have considerable palliative care needs. Yet, these patients are less likely to receive palliative care than their medical counterparts and palliative care consultations often occur when death is imminent, reflecting poor quality end-of-life care. Surgical patients would likely benefit from early palliative care delivered alongside surgical treatment to promote goal-concordant decision making and to improve patients' physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well-being and quality of life. To date, evidence to support the role of palliative care in surgical practice is sparse and palliative care research in surgery is encumbered by methodological challenges and entrenched cultural norms that impede appropriate provision of palliative care. The objective of this article was to describe the existing science of palliative care in surgery within three priority areas and expose specific gaps within the field. We propose a research agenda to address these gaps and provide a road map for future investigation.
Keywords: goals of care; life-limiting illness; palliative care; palliative care research; surgical patients.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Schwarze is supported by the Grants for Early Medical/Surgical Specialists' Transition to Aging Research Award (GEMSSTAR R03AG047920) and the American Geriatrics Society/Society of Vascular Surgery, Jahnigen Career Development Award. Dr. Schwarze also received funding during this time but not for support of this project from PCORI (1502-27462), the Greenwall Foundation and the National Palliative Care Research Center. Dr. Cooper is supported by the Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders Career Development Award in Aging (1K76AG054859-01) and the Cambia Foundation. Dr. Cooper also received funding during this time, but not for support of this project, from PCORI (1502-27462), the American Geriatrics Society Geriatrics for Specialists Initiative, National Cancer Institute (1R35CA197730-01), and the National Institute on Aging (95R01AG044518-02). Dr. Mosenthal received funding during this time, but not for support of this project, from PCORI (1502-27462). Dr. Lilley reports no disclosures.
References
-
- American College of Surgeons; Task Force on Surgical Palliative Care; and Committee on Ethics: Statement of principles of palliative care. Bull Am Coll Surg 2005;90:34–35 - PubMed
-
- Surgeons Palliative Care Workgroup: Office of promoting excellence in end-of-life care: Surgeon's palliative care workgroup report from the field. J Am College Surg 2003;197:661–686 - PubMed
-
- Lilley EJ, Khan KT, Johnston FM, et al. : Palliative care interventions for surgical patients: A systematic review. JAMA Surg 2016;151:172–183 - PubMed
-
- Axelsson B, Christensen SB: Evaluation of a hospital-based palliative support service with particular regard to financial outcome measures. Palliat Med 1998;12:41–49 - PubMed
-
- Hall RI, Rocker GM, Murray D: Simple changes can improve conduct of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Canadian journal of anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:631–636 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
