Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 1;24(4):867-879.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw166.

Using digital interventions to improve the cardiometabolic health of populations: a meta-review of reporting quality

Adrienne O'Neil  1   2 , Fiona Cocker  1   2 , Patricia Rarau  1 , Shaira Baptista  1 , Mandy Cassimatis  1 , C Barr Taylor  3 , Annie Y S Lau  4 , Nitya Kanuri  3 , Brian Oldenburg  1
Affiliations
Review

Using digital interventions to improve the cardiometabolic health of populations: a meta-review of reporting quality

Adrienne O'Neil et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a meta-review to determine the reporting quality of user-centered digital interventions for the prevention and management of cardiometabolic conditions.

Materials and methods: Using predetermined inclusion criteria, systematic reviews published between 2010 and 2015 were identified from 3 databases. To assess whether current evidence is sufficient to inform wider uptake and implementation of digital health programs, we assessed the quality of reporting of research findings using (1) endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, (2) a quality assessment framework (eg, Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool), and (3) 8 parameters of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile HEalth Applications and onLine TeleHealth (CONSORT-eHEALTH) guidelines (developed in 2010).

Results: Of the 33 systematic reviews covering social media, Web-based programs, mobile health programs, and composite modalities, 6 reported using the recommended PRISMA guidelines. Seven did not report using a quality assessment framework. Applying the CONSORT-EHEALTH guidelines, reporting was of mild to moderate strength.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first meta-review to provide a comprehensive analysis of the quality of reporting of research findings for a range of digital health interventions. Our findings suggest that the evidence base and quality of reporting in this rapidly developing field needs significant improvement in order to inform wider implementation and uptake.

Conclusion: The inconsistent quality of reporting of digital health interventions for cardiometabolic outcomes may be a critical impediment to real-world implementation.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; diabetes; digital health; prevention; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of results of search.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. GSMA Intelligence. Secondary GSMA Intelligence. 2014. https://gsmaintelligence.com/. Accessed December 1, 2015.
    1. Oldenburg B, Taylor CB, O'Neil A et al. . Using new technologies to improve the prevention and management of chronic conditions in populations. Ann. Rev. Public Health. 2015;36:483–505. - PubMed
    1. Eapen ZJ, Peterson ED. Can mobile health applications facilitate meaningful behavior change? time for answers. JAMA. 2015;31412:1236.–. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong S. Which app should I use? BMJ 2015;351:h4597. - PubMed
    1. Kumar N, Khunger M, Gupta A et al. . A content analysis of smartphone-based applications for hypertension management. J. Am. Soc. Hypertension. 92:130.–. - PubMed