Leveraging molecular datasets for biomarker-based clinical trial design in glioblastoma
- PMID: 28339723
- PMCID: PMC5570228
- DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now312
Leveraging molecular datasets for biomarker-based clinical trial design in glioblastoma
Abstract
Background: Biomarkers can improve clinical trial efficiency, but designing and interpreting biomarker-driven trials require knowledge of relationships among biomarkers, clinical covariates, and endpoints. We investigated these relationships across genomic subgroups of glioblastoma (GBM) within our institution (DF/BWCC), validated results in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and demonstrated potential impacts on clinical trial design and interpretation.
Methods: We identified genotyped patients at DF/BWCC, and clinical associations across 4 common GBM genomic biomarker groups were compared along with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival post-progression (SPP). Significant associations were validated in TCGA. Biomarker-based clinical trials were simulated using various assumptions.
Results: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)(+) and p53(-) subgroups were more likely isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)(+) patients were older, and patients with O6-DNA methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT)-promoter methylation were more often female. OS, PFS, and SPP were all longer for IDH mutant and MGMT methylated patients, but there was no independent prognostic value for other genomic subgroups. PI3K(+) patients had shorter PFS among IDH wild-type tumors, however, and no DF/BWCC long-term survivors were either EGFR(+) (0% vs 7%, P = .014) or p53(-) (0% vs 10%, P = .005). The degree of biomarker overlap impacted the efficiency of Bayesian-adaptive clinical trials, while PFS and OS distribution variation had less impact. Biomarker frequency was proportionally associated with sample size in all designs.
Conclusions: We identified several associations between GBM genomic subgroups and clinical or molecular prognostic covariates and validated known prognostic factors in all survival periods. These results are important for biomarker-based trial design and interpretation of biomarker-only and nonrandomized trials.
Keywords: biomarkers; clinical trial design; glioblastoma.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figures


Comment in
-
Toward more informative biomarker-based clinical trials in glioblastoma.Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):880-881. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox063. Neuro Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28521009 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Negative prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor copy number gain in young adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma.J Neurooncol. 2019 Nov;145(2):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03298-6. Epub 2019 Sep 21. J Neurooncol. 2019. PMID: 31542863
-
O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation as prognostic factors in a cohort of Saudi patients with glioblastoma.Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;39(6):410-416. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.410. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Ann Saudi Med. 2019. PMID: 31804140 Free PMC article.
-
A practical review of prognostic correlations of molecular biomarkers in glioblastoma.Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Mar;38(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14755. Neurosurg Focus. 2015. PMID: 25727226 Review.
-
Arterial spin labeling perfusion-weighted imaging aids in prediction of molecular biomarkers and survival in glioblastomas.Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1202-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06379-2. Epub 2019 Aug 29. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31468161
-
The prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma: A meta-analysis of clinical trials.J Cell Physiol. 2018 Jan;233(1):378-386. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25896. Epub 2017 May 16. J Cell Physiol. 2018. PMID: 28266716 Review.
Cited by
-
The FDA NIH Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) resource in neuro-oncology.Neuro Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;20(9):1162-1172. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox242. Neuro Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29294069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Next Frontier in Health Disparities-A Closer Look at Exploring Sex Differences in Glioma Data and Omics Analysis, from Bench to Bedside and Back.Biomolecules. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):1203. doi: 10.3390/biom12091203. Biomolecules. 2022. PMID: 36139042 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A platform for efficient early evaluation of biomarker-associated therapies in newly diagnosed IDH wild-type, MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma.Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):6-7. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy190. Neuro Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30590835 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evaluating hematologic parameters in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: Prognostic utility and clinical trial implications of myelosuppression.Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Jul 8;5(1):vdad083. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad083. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Neurooncol Adv. 2023. PMID: 37554224 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of Predictive Analyses for Interim Decisions in Clinical Trials.JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Feb;7:e2200606. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00606. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36848613 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Rodón J, Saura C, Dienstmann R, et al. Molecular prescreening to select patient population in early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(6):359–366. - PubMed
-
- Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(1):97–100. - PubMed
-
- Conley BA, Doroshow JH. Molecular analysis for therapy choice: NCI MATCH. Semin Oncol. 2014;41(3):297–299. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous