Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 1;32(suppl_2):ii13-ii18.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465.

Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other

Marlies Noordzij  1 , Merel van Diepen  2 , Fergus C Caskey  3 , Kitty J Jager  1
Affiliations

Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other

Marlies Noordzij et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. .

Erratum in

Abstract

For the presentation of risk, both relative and absolute measures can be used. The relative risk is most often used, especially in studies showing the effects of a treatment. Relative risks have the appealing feature of summarizing two numbers (the risk in one group and the risk in the other) into one. However, this feature also represents their major weakness, that the underlying absolute risks are concealed and readers tend to overestimate the effect when it is presented in relative terms. In many situations, the absolute risk gives a better representation of the actual situation and also from the patient's point of view absolute risks often give more relevant information. In this article, we explain the concepts of both relative and absolute risk measures. Using examples from nephrology literature we illustrate that unless ratio measures are reported with the underlying absolute risks, readers cannot judge the clinical relevance of the effect. We therefore recommend to report both the relative risk and the absolute risk with their 95% confidence intervals, as together they provide a complete picture of the effect and its implications.

Keywords: absolute risk difference; epidemiology; number needed to treat; relative risk; risk reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer