Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care
- PMID: 28340128
- PMCID: PMC7651968
- DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx017
Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care
Abstract
While great progress has been made in digitizing the US health care system, today's health information technology (IT) infrastructure remains largely a collection of systems that are not designed to support a transition to value-based care. In addition, the pursuit of value-based care, in which we deliver better care with better outcomes at lower cost, places new demands on the health care system that our IT infrastructure needs to be able to support. Provider organizations pursuing new models of health care delivery and payment are finding that their electronic systems lack the capabilities needed to succeed. The result is a chasm between the current health IT ecosystem and the health IT ecosystem that is desperately needed.In this paper, we identify a set of focal goals and associated near-term achievable actions that are critical to pursue in order to enable the health IT ecosystem to meet the acute needs of modern health care delivery. These ideas emerged from discussions that occurred during the 2015 American Medical Informatics Association Policy Invitational Meeting. To illustrate the chasm and motivate our recommendations, we created a vignette from the multistakeholder perspectives of a patient, his provider, and researchers/innovators. It describes an idealized scenario in which each stakeholder's needs are supported by an integrated health IT environment. We identify the gaps preventing such a reality today and present associated policy recommendations that serve as a blueprint for critical actions that would enable us to cross the current health IT chasm by leveraging systems and information to routinely deliver high-value care.
Keywords: AMIA; health reform; policy.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. U.S. hospital adoption of patient engagement functionalities. Health IT Quick-Stat #24. September 2016. http://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-Adoption-of-.... Accessed December 20, 2016.
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Cancer Clinical Trials and the NCI Cooperative Group Program; Nass SJ, Moses HL, Mendelsohn J, eds. A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010. 4, Physician and Patient Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220370/. Accessed November 8, 2016. - PubMed
-
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Percent of Hospitals, by Type, that Possess Certified Health IT. Health IT Quick-Stat #52. May 2016. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/certified-electronic-health-reco.... Accessed February 28, 2017.
-
- Jamoom E, Yang N, Hing E. Percentage of office-based physicians using any electronic health records or electronic medical records, physicians that have a basic system, and physicians that have a certified system, by state: United States, 2014 (table). Bethesda, MD: NCHS/CDC; 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources