Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 24;16(1):55.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0552-8.

The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database

Yefei Zhang  1
Affiliations

The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database

Yefei Zhang. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Share 35 policy was instituted in June 2013 by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in order to reduce death on liver transplant waiting list. The effect of this policy on racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation has not been examined.

Methods: A total of 14,585 adult patients registered for liver transplantation between 2012 and 2015 were identified from UNOS database. Logistic and proportional hazards models were used to model the effects of race and ethnicity on access to liver transplantation. Stratification on pre- and post-Share 35 periods was performed to compare the first 18 months of Share 35 policy to an equivalent time period before.

Results: Comparison of the pre- and post-Share 35 periods showed significantly decreased time on waiting list and increased numbers of minorities having access to liver transplantation. Hispanic recipients still experienced significantly longer waiting time (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53-0.88) before they received liver transplantation after Share 35 policy took effect.

Conclusion: The Share 35 policy did not lead to improved access to liver transplantation among minorities but eliminated the previously observed racial and ethnic disparities in transplant rates as well as shortened the waiting time.

Keywords: Liver transplantation; Racial and ethnic disparities; Share 35 policy; United Network for Organ Sharing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for inclusion and exclusion of study population
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. U.S. Census Bureau, 2015. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo.... Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
    1. Nguyen GC, Thuluvath PJ. Racial disparity in liver disease: biological, cultural, or socioeconomic factors. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):1058–66. doi: 10.1002/hep.22223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrion AF, Ghanta R, Carrasquillo O, et al. Chronic liver disease in the Hispanic population of the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;9(10):834–e110. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Network for Organ Sharing. 2017. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/##. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
    1. Quillin RC, III, Wilson GC, Wima K, et al. Neighborhood level effects of socioeconomic status on liver transplant selection and recipient survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1934–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.020. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms