Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;7(3):393-404.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0486-0.

Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies

Affiliations

Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies

Christopher M Shea et al. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation (CEDI) research is challenging for a variety of reasons. Currently, there is not specific guidance or a tool available for researchers to assess their readiness to conduct CEDI research. We propose a conceptual framework that identifies detailed competencies for researchers participating in CEDI and maps these competencies to domains. The framework is a necessary step toward developing a CEDI research readiness survey that measures a researcher's attitudes, willingness, and self-reported ability for acquiring the knowledge and performing the behaviors necessary for effective community engagement. The conceptual framework for CEDI competencies was developed by a team of eight faculty and staff affiliated with a university's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). The authors developed CEDI competencies by identifying the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors necessary for carrying out commonly accepted CE principles. After collectively developing an initial list of competencies, team members individually mapped each competency to a single domain that provided the best fit. Following the individual mapping, the group held two sessions in which the sorting preferences were shared and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. During this discussion, modifications to wording of competencies and domains were made as needed. The team then engaged five community stakeholders to review and modify the competencies and domains. The CEDI framework consists of 40 competencies organized into nine domains: perceived value of CE in D&I research, introspection and openness, knowledge of community characteristics, appreciation for stakeholder's experience with and attitudes toward research, preparing the partnership for collaborative decision-making, collaborative planning for the research design and goals, communication effectiveness, equitable distribution of resources and credit, and sustaining the partnership. Delineation of CEDI competencies advances the broader CE principles and D&I research goals found in the literature and facilitates development of readiness assessments tied to specific training resources for researchers interested in conducting CEDI research.

Keywords: Community engagement; Dissemination and implementation; Education and training; Implementation science; Stakeholder engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This project did not include human and animal subjects or secondary data sources about human subjects and therefore was not reviewed by an IRB.

References

    1. Chambers DA, Azrin ST. Partnership: a fundamental component of dissemination and implementation research. Psychiatric Services. 2013;64(16):509–511. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spoth R, Clair S, Greenberg M, Redmond C, Shin C. Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007;21(2):137–146. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Research, N. A. M. H. C. S., & Workgroup, C. E . The road ahead: research partnerships to transform services. Bethesda: National Institute of Mental Health; 2006.
    1. Palinkas LA, Short C, Wong M. Research-practice-policy partnerships for implementation of evidence-based practices in child welfare and child mental health. New York: William T. Grant Foundation; 2015.
    1. Inkelas M, Brown AF, Vassar SD, Sankaré IC, Martinez AB, Kubicek K, et al. Enhancing dissemination, implementation, and improvement science in CTSAs through regional partnerships. Clinical and Translational Science. 2015;8(6):800–806. doi: 10.1111/cts.12348. - DOI - PMC - PubMed