Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Psychostimulants
- PMID: 28341944
- DOI: 10.1007/7854_2017_5
Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Psychostimulants
Abstract
Numerous drugs elicit locomotor stimulant effects at appropriate doses; however, we typically reserve the term psychostimulant to refer to drugs with affinity for monoamine reuptake transporters. This chapter comprises select experiments that have characterized the discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants using drug discrimination procedures. The substitution profiles of psychostimulants in laboratory rodents are generally consistent with those observed in human and nonhuman primate drug discrimination experiments. Notably, two major classes of psychostimulants can be distinguished as those that function as passive monoamine reuptake inhibitors (such as cocaine) and those that function as substrates for monoamine transporters and stimulate monoamine release (such as the amphetamines). Nevertheless, the discriminative stimulus effects of both classes of psychostimulant are quite similar, and drugs from different classes will substitute for one another. Most importantly, for both the cocaine-like and amphetamine-like psychostimulants, dopaminergic mechanisms most saliently determine discriminative stimulus effects, but these effects can be modulated by alterations in noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission as well. Thusly, the drug discrimination assay is useful for characterizing the interoceptive effects of psychostimulants and determining the mechanisms that contribute to their subjective effects in humans.
Keywords: Discriminative stimulus; Drug discrimination; Monoamine transporter blocker; Monoamine transporter releaser/substrate; Preclinical model; Psychostimulants; Stimulus properties.
Similar articles
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants and hallucinogens in S(+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and R(-)-MDMA trained mice.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Nov;331(2):717-23. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.156174. Epub 2009 Aug 14. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009. PMID: 19684254 Free PMC article.
-
Psychostimulant-like discriminative stimulus and locomotor sensitization properties of the wake-promoting agent modafinil in rodents.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Jun;95(4):449-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 25. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010. PMID: 20346966 Free PMC article.
-
The acute effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on the stimulus effects of hallucinogens.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999 Jul;63(3):507-13. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00039-8. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999. PMID: 10418794
-
Adrenaline rush: the role of adrenergic receptors in stimulant-induced behaviors.Mol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;85(4):640-50. doi: 10.1124/mol.113.090118. Epub 2014 Feb 5. Mol Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24499709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Hallucinogenic and Dissociative Anesthetic Drugs.Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2018;39:141-152. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_29. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 27586539 Review.
Cited by
-
Discriminative stimulus properties of α-ethyltryptamine (α-ET) in rats: α-ET-like effects of MDMA, MDA and aryl-monomethoxy substituted derivatives of α-ET.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jun;242(6):1407-1418. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06738-y. Epub 2024 Dec 28. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025. PMID: 39731580
-
Effects of dopaminergic and serotonergic compounds in rats trained to discriminate a high and a low training dose of the synthetic cathinone mephedrone.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Mar;236(3):1015-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05241-z. Epub 2019 Apr 13. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019. PMID: 30980094 Free PMC article.
-
Psychostimulant Use Disorder, an Unmet Therapeutic Goal: Can Modafinil Narrow the Gap?Front Neurosci. 2021 May 26;15:656475. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.656475. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34121988 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methylphenidate-effects on orthodontic tooth movement, orthodontically induced and nonorthodontic root resorption? : A micro-computed tomography and immunohistochemical analysis.J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00567-6. Online ahead of print. J Orofac Orthop. 2025. PMID: 39747652 English.
-
The Bidirectional Interplay Between Substances of Abuse and Gut Microbiome Homeostasis.Life (Basel). 2025 May 22;15(6):834. doi: 10.3390/life15060834. Life (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40566488 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Glennon RA, Young R (2011) Methodological considerations. In: Glennon RA, Young R (eds) Drug discrimination: applications to medicinal chemistry and drug studies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, pp. 19–40
-
- Porter JH, Prus AJ (2017) Introduction and overview of drug discrimination. In Porter JH, Prus AJ (eds) The behavioral neuroscience of drug discrimination
-
- Quiñones-Jenab V, Perrotti LI, Fabian SJ, Chin J, Russo SJ, Jenab S (2001) Endocrinological basis of sex differences in cocaine-induced behavioral responses. Ann N Y Acad Sci 937:140–171
-
- Segarra AC, Agosto-Rivera JL, Febo M, Lugo-Escobar N, Menéndez-Delmestre R, Puig-Ramos A, Torres-Diaz YM (2010) Estradiol: a key biological substrate mediating the response to cocaine in female rats. Horm Behav 58:33–43
-
- Becker JB, Koob GF (2016) Sex differences in animal models: focus on addiction. Pharmacol Rev 68:242–263 - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources