A retrospective study comparing the outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- PMID: 28342002
- PMCID: PMC5504129
- DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2401-y
A retrospective study comparing the outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes and toxicities of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Methods: A total of 176 children with non-metastatic NPC treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between October 2003 and September 2013 were included in this study. Of the 176 patients, 74 received 2D-CRT and 102 were treated with IMRT. The clinical outcomes and acute and late toxicities were determined and compared.
Results: The IMRT group achieved significantly higher overall survival (OS) (90.4% vs. 76.1% at 5 year, P = 0.007) and disease-free survival (DFS) (85.7% vs. 71.2%, P = 0.029) mainly due to an improvement in locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) (97.9 vs. 88.3%, P = 0.049). After stratification by disease stage, IMRT provided significant benefits for patients with stage III-IV disease in terms of OS, LRRFS and DFS. Multivariate analyses indicated that the treatment group (2D-CRT vs. IMRT) was a prognostic factor for OS, LRRFS and DFS. A significant reduction in Grade 2-4 xerostomia (52.7 vs. 34.3%, P = 0.015) and hearing loss (40.5 vs. 22.5%, P = 0.010) was observed in patients treated by IMRT.
Conclusion: IMRT provides better locoregional relapse-free survival and overall survival, especially in late-stage children and adolescent NPC patients, and is associated with a lower incidence of Grade 2-4 xerostomia as well as hearing loss compared with 2D-CRT. Distant metastasis remains a challenge in the treatment of children and adolescent NPC.
Keywords: Children and adolescents; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Treatment result; Two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ayan I, Kaytan E, Ayan N (2003) Childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: from biology to treatment [J]. Lancet Oncol 4(1):13–21 - PubMed
-
- Bhide SA, Nutting CM (2010) Advances in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J]. Oral Oncol 46(6):439–441 - PubMed
-
- Buehrlen M, Zwaan CM, Granzen B, Lassay L, Deutz P, Vorwerk P et al (2012) Multimodal treatment, including interferon beta, of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and young adults: preliminary results from the prospective, multicenter study NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG[J]. Cancer 118(19):4892–4900 - PubMed
-
- Chen SW, Yang SN, Liang JA, Shiau AC, Lin FJ (2005) Comparative dosimetric study of two strategies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer[J]. Med Dosi 30(4):219–227 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
