Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan-Mar;6(1):1-15.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORAL KETAMINE PREMEDICATION IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING DAY CASE SURGERY

O O Oyedepo  1 , A A Nasir  2 , L O Abdur-Rahman  2 , I K Kolawole  1 , B O Bolaji  1 , O A Ige  1
Affiliations

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORAL KETAMINE PREMEDICATION IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING DAY CASE SURGERY

O O Oyedepo et al. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Oral premedication for paediatric age group is an uncommon practice amongst anaesthetists in Nigeria. Both parents and the child suffer some form of emotional or psychological distress.

Aim: To determine the efficacy and safety of oral formulated ketamine for premedication in children scheduled for ambulatory surgeries.

Methods: Seventy three children aged 1 - 6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II were prospectively studied. They were assigned randomly to receive either 5 mg/kg (Group A), 10 mg/kg (Group B), or no ketamine (Group C).The children were observed for acceptance of premedication, sedation and anxiolysis at 10, 20 and 30 minutes after drug administration. Behavior/response of each child at the time of separation from parents, intravenous access, and acceptance of facemask for induction, postanaesthetic arousal state and complications were also recorded.

Results: There were 73 children in this study with a mean age of 37.4±18.0 months. The groups were comparable in age. The studied agent was tolerated by both groups that received premedication with no significant difference (P 0.73). Adequate sedation and anxiolysis were observed in groups A and B, (52%, 84%) and (68%, 88%) respectively. However, more children in group B (82.6%) had satisfactory behaviour at separation from parents and a better acceptance of anaesthetic face mask (64%) at induction than those in groups A and C (33.3%, 21.7%, respectively). No side effect was recorded in either of the premedication groups or the control group.

Conclusion: Oral ketamine is acceptable and safe premedication for children. It provided good sedation, relieved anxiety and had no side effect in the children at the studied doses.

Keywords: Children; Day Case Surgery; Oral Ketamine; Premedication; Safe and efficacious.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Beeby DG, Morgan HJ. Behaviour of unsedated children in the anaesthetic room. B J Anaesth. 1980;52:279–281. - PubMed
    1. Debate Pro-Con. The Place for Premedication in Paediatric Practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:817–828. - PubMed
    1. Ashwani K, Anuradha AS, Rakesh G, Mridu PN. Comparative Evaluation of Ketamine, Midazolam and Combination of Both as Oral Premedicants in Children. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2009;25:449–453.
    1. Lakshmi V. Preanaesthetic evaluation and premedication in paediatrics. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2009;25(4):449–453.
    1. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Wang SM, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB. Parental presence during induction of anaesthesia versus sedative premedication. Which intervention is more effective? Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1147–1156. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources