Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

I funny Channel Inhibitors: An Emerging Option for Heart Failure

In: CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016. 151.
.
Free Books & Documents
Review

I funny Channel Inhibitors: An Emerging Option for Heart Failure

Yujeong Kim et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

  1. Ifunny (If), or funny current, channel inhibitors are a class of drugs with heart rate reducing properties (negative chronotropic drugs) and ivabradine is the first representative of this drug class; it was recently tested for the treatment of heart failure (HF).

  2. Based on currently available evidence, it can be interpreted that ivabradine may have a role in the treatment of patients who have a certain form of HF. So for patients with symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤ 35%); that is, with the lower-left part of their heart not contracting well, with a heart rate of 70 beats per minute (bpm) or higher and for patients who are unable to tolerate optimal beta-blocker dosing. Of note, patients with HFrEF who have a heart rate greater than 77 bpm may be the ones to derive the most benefit from initiating ivabradine therapy.

  3. Ivabradine was evaluated in more than 10 clinical trials for a number of cardiovascular (CV) uses including coronary artery disease, angina, myocardial infarction, and HF. While an initial HF study, BEAUTIFUL (morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the If inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction), did not find significant improvement in cardiac outcomes with ivabradine, findings from a prespecified subgroup of patients with a heart rate of 70 bpm or higher suggested a correlation between the resting heart rate and the risk of CV events; this observation led to further investigation of ivabradine for the treatment of HF.

  4. The clinical development of ivabradine continued with the SHIFT (Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial) study. This study targeted patients with HFrEF, in sinus rhythm (i.e., normal heartbeat) and with a heart rate of 70 bpm or higher. The phase 3 trial evaluated the morbidity and mortality benefits of ivabradine as an add-on therapy to standard treatment for HF, including the use of a beta-blocker if tolerated, compared with placebo. Results showed that when ivabradine is added on to guidelines-based background therapy, there is a statistically significant decrease of 18% in the rate of primary end point (composite of CV death or hospital admission for worsening HF) compared with placebo.

  5. Of note, 89% of patients enrolled in the SHIFT trial were on beta-blockers. However, despite aiming to treat patients at the guidelines-specified target dose for beta-blockers, only 56% of patients were on at least 50% of the target dose and, 26% of patients were at target dose. The most common reasons for suboptimal dosing of beta-blocking therapy were hypotension and fatigue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Weeda ER, Nguyen E, White CM. Role of ivabradine in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;50(6):475–85. - PubMed
    1. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Robertson M, Ferrari R, et al. Relationship between ivabradine treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with limiting angina: a subgroup analysis of the randomized, controlled BEAUTIFUL trial. Eur Heart J [Internet] 2009. Oct, pp. 2337–45. [cited 2016 Jul 28] Available from: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/ehj/30/19/2337.full.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Dipiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GR, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey ML. Pharmacotherapy: a physiological approach [Book] 9th edition. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education Medical; 2014. [cited 2016 Aug 23]
    1. 2016 report on the health of Canadians: the burden of heart failure [Internet] Ottawa (ON): Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; 2016. [cited 2016 Jul 28]. Available from: http://www.heartandstroke.com/atf/cf/%7B99452d8be7f1-4bd6-a57d-b136ce6c9....
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet] 2013. Oct 15, pp. e147–e239. [cited 2016 Jul 28] Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0735109713021141/1-s2.0-S0735109713021141-main.pd.... - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources