Response to "Comment on State-of-the-Art Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism: Ventilation/Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Controversies, Results, and Recommendations from a Systematic Review"
- PMID: 28346962
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1598007
Response to "Comment on State-of-the-Art Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism: Ventilation/Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Controversies, Results, and Recommendations from a Systematic Review"
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Comment on
-
Comment on "State-of-the-Art Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism: Ventilation/Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Controversies, Results, and Recommendations from a Systematic Review".Semin Thromb Hemost. 2017 Nov;43(8):902-903. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1598006. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2017. PMID: 28219083 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical