Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;20(5):673-689.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12762. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination

Affiliations
Review

Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination

Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki et al. Ecol Lett. 2017 May.

Abstract

Worldwide, human appropriation of ecosystems is disrupting plant-pollinator communities and pollination function through habitat conversion and landscape homogenisation. Conversion to agriculture is destroying and degrading semi-natural ecosystems while conventional land-use intensification (e.g. industrial management of large-scale monocultures with high chemical inputs) homogenises landscape structure and quality. Together, these anthropogenic processes reduce the connectivity of populations and erode floral and nesting resources to undermine pollinator abundance and diversity, and ultimately pollination services. Ecological intensification of agriculture represents a strategic alternative to ameliorate these drivers of pollinator decline while supporting sustainable food production, by promoting biodiversity beneficial to agricultural production through management practices such as intercropping, crop rotations, farm-level diversification and reduced agrochemical use. We critically evaluate its potential to address and reverse the land use and management trends currently degrading pollinator communities and potentially causing widespread pollination deficits. We find that many of the practices that constitute ecological intensification can contribute to mitigating the drivers of pollinator decline. Our findings support ecological intensification as a solution to pollinator declines, and we discuss ways to promote it in agricultural policy and practice.

Keywords: Crop production; diversification; food security; grazing/mowing intensity; habitat loss; landscape fragmentation; mass-flowering crops; wild pollinator diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ågren, J. , Hellström, F. , Toräng, P. & Ehrlén, J. (2013). Mutualists and antagonists drive among‐population variation in selection and evolution of floral display in a perennial herb. P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 18202–18207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguilar, R. , Ashworth, L. , Galetto, L. & Aizen, M. (2006). Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta‐analysis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 968–980. - PubMed
    1. Aizen, M. , Gleiser, G. , Sabatino, M. , Gilarranz, L. , Bascompte, J. & Verdú, M. (2016). The phylogenetic structure of plant‐pollinator networks increases with habitat size and isolation. Ecol. Lett., 19, 29–36. - PubMed
    1. Alam, M. , Olivier, A. , Paquette, A. , Dupras, J. , Revéret, J. & Messier, C. (2014). A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree‐based intercropping systems. Agroforest. Syst., 88, 679–691.
    1. Alaux, C. , Ducloz, F. , Crauser, D. & Le Conte, Y. (2010). Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol. Lett., 6, 562–565. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types