Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination
- PMID: 28346980
- PMCID: PMC6849539
- DOI: 10.1111/ele.12762
Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination
Abstract
Worldwide, human appropriation of ecosystems is disrupting plant-pollinator communities and pollination function through habitat conversion and landscape homogenisation. Conversion to agriculture is destroying and degrading semi-natural ecosystems while conventional land-use intensification (e.g. industrial management of large-scale monocultures with high chemical inputs) homogenises landscape structure and quality. Together, these anthropogenic processes reduce the connectivity of populations and erode floral and nesting resources to undermine pollinator abundance and diversity, and ultimately pollination services. Ecological intensification of agriculture represents a strategic alternative to ameliorate these drivers of pollinator decline while supporting sustainable food production, by promoting biodiversity beneficial to agricultural production through management practices such as intercropping, crop rotations, farm-level diversification and reduced agrochemical use. We critically evaluate its potential to address and reverse the land use and management trends currently degrading pollinator communities and potentially causing widespread pollination deficits. We find that many of the practices that constitute ecological intensification can contribute to mitigating the drivers of pollinator decline. Our findings support ecological intensification as a solution to pollinator declines, and we discuss ways to promote it in agricultural policy and practice.
Keywords: Crop production; diversification; food security; grazing/mowing intensity; habitat loss; landscape fragmentation; mass-flowering crops; wild pollinator diversity.
© 2017 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Increased pollinator habitat enhances cacao fruit set and predator conservation.Ecol Appl. 2017 Apr;27(3):887-899. doi: 10.1002/eap.1491. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Ecol Appl. 2017. PMID: 28019052
-
Crop fertilization affects pollination service provision - Common bean as a case study.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0204460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204460. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30388124 Free PMC article.
-
Native Flowering Border Crops Attract High Pollinator Abundance and Diversity, Providing Growers the Opportunity to Enhance Pollination Services.Environ Entomol. 2022 Apr 22;51(2):492-504. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvac013. Environ Entomol. 2022. PMID: 35298611
-
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721. Proc Biol Sci. 2007. PMID: 17164193 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world.Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020 Sep 8;4(2):229-240. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20190205. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020. PMID: 32886114 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pollinator functional group abundance and floral heterogeneity in an agroecological context affect mating patterns in a self-incompatible wild plant.Am J Bot. 2024 Dec;111(12):e16440. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16440. Epub 2024 Nov 26. Am J Bot. 2024. PMID: 39592516 Free PMC article.
-
The Mahaweli Development Project and the 'rendering technical' of agrarian development in Sri Lanka.Heliyon. 2019 Jun 4;5(6):e01811. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01811. eCollection 2019 Jun. Heliyon. 2019. PMID: 31194081 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial inoculants as effective agents in minimizing the non-target impact of azadirachtin pesticide and promoting plant growth of Vigna radiata.Arch Microbiol. 2022 Aug 13;204(9):555. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03162-8. Arch Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35962834
-
A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland.J Appl Ecol. 2020 Apr;57(4):681-694. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13572. Epub 2020 Feb 16. J Appl Ecol. 2020. PMID: 32362684 Free PMC article.
-
Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth.Conserv Lett. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):e12713. doi: 10.1111/conl.12713. Epub 2020 Apr 13. Conserv Lett. 2020. PMID: 32999687 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aguilar, R. , Ashworth, L. , Galetto, L. & Aizen, M. (2006). Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta‐analysis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 968–980. - PubMed
-
- Aizen, M. , Gleiser, G. , Sabatino, M. , Gilarranz, L. , Bascompte, J. & Verdú, M. (2016). The phylogenetic structure of plant‐pollinator networks increases with habitat size and isolation. Ecol. Lett., 19, 29–36. - PubMed
-
- Alam, M. , Olivier, A. , Paquette, A. , Dupras, J. , Revéret, J. & Messier, C. (2014). A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree‐based intercropping systems. Agroforest. Syst., 88, 679–691.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources