Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;139(4):873e-882e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003225.

Top Surgery in Transgender Men: How Far Can You Push the Envelope?

Rachel Bluebond-Langner  1   2 , Jens U Berli  1   2 , Jennifer Sabino  1   2 , Karan Chopra  1   2 , Devinder Singh  1   2 , Beverly Fischer  1   2
Affiliations

Top Surgery in Transgender Men: How Far Can You Push the Envelope?

Rachel Bluebond-Langner et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The authors present their grading scale and the outcomes of the largest cohort of top surgery published to date. Application of this grading system can help determine which patients will benefit from a subcutaneous mastectomy with free nipple graft versus a circumareolar technique, with the primary endpoint being need for aesthetic revisions.

Methods: The authors reviewed their database of transgender males who underwent bilateral mastectomy between 2006 and 2015. Data collected included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, testosterone use, months of social transition, technique used, postoperative complications, and need for revision. Two techniques were used, circumareolar incision and free nipple graft technique.

Results: Between 2006 and 2015, 1686 consecutive mastectomies were performed on 843 patients. Of those, 548 patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Of the 295 included, 109 were treated using a circumareolar incision and 186 were treated using a free nipple graft technique. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of aesthetic revisions in the grade 2B circumareolar incision group (34 percent versus 8.8 percent).

Conclusions: The authors' outcomes are comparable to the literature, and demonstrate that these procedures can safely be performed in an outpatient setting. The authors' grading scale classifies patients and helps the surgeon select a surgical technique. The authors show a statistical difference in rates of aesthetic revisions in Fischer grade 2B patients when a circumareolar incision is selected over a free nipple graft technique.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Richards C, Barrett JThe case for bilateral mastectomy and male chest contouring for the female-to-male transsexual. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:93–95.
    1. Antoszewski B, Bratoś R, Sitek A, Fijałkowska MLong-term results of breast reduction in female-to-male transsexuals. Pol Przegl Chir. 2012;84:144–151.
    1. Davidson BAConcentric circle operation for massive gynecomastia to excise the redundant skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:350–354.
    1. Hage JJ, Bloem JJChest wall contouring for female-to-male transsexuals: Amsterdam experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:59–66.
    1. Hage JJ, van Kesteren PJChest-wall contouring in female-to-male transsexuals: Basic considerations and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:386–391.