Evolution of a Surgical Philosophy in Orthognathic Surgery
- PMID: 28350681
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003216
Evolution of a Surgical Philosophy in Orthognathic Surgery
Abstract
A surgical philosophy of orthognathic surgery is presented. It has evolved over an entire surgical career as orthognathic surgical goals have evolved to become primarily aesthetic. In this context, the occlusal result serves as a means of achieving the aesthetic ends. It relies on the physical examination, using qualitative concepts of facial appearance, to be the most important determinant of treatment plans. It makes a distinction between a quantitatively normal face and one that is visually well proportioned and emphasizes the attributes of the soft tissue. The emotional expression of the patient is also considered in treatment planning. By using surgical tactics that provide control of facial projection and height, this philosophy affords the surgeon an opportunity to manipulate the skeletal elements to the extent that one can simultaneously achieve a well-proportioned face and favorably influence the appearance of the soft tissues and facial countenance.
References
-
- Rosen HMMiniplate fixation of Le Fort I osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:748–755.
-
- Carpenter CW, Nanda RS, Currier GFThe skeletal stability of Le Fort I downfracture osteotomies with rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:922–925.
-
- Wardrop RW, Wolford LMMaxillary stability following downgraft and/or advancement procedures with stabilization using rigid fixation and porous block hydroxyapatite implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:336–342.
-
- Kierl MJ, Nanda RS, Currier GFA 3-year evaluation of skeletal stability of mandibular advancement with rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:587–592.
-
- Rosen HMPorous, block hydroxyapatite as an interpositional bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:985–990; discussion 991.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources