Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 28;7(1):469.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00526-9.

Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory

Affiliations

Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory

Kay L Ritchie et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

First impressions of social traits, such as attractiveness, from faces are often claimed to be made automatically, given their speed and reliability. However, speed of processing is only one aspect of automaticity. Here we address a further aspect, asking whether impression formation is mandatory. Mandatory formation requires that impressions are formed about social traits even when this is task-irrelevant, and that once formed, these impressions are difficult to inhibit. In two experiments, participants learned what new people looked like for the purpose of future identification, from sets of images high or low in attractiveness. They then rated middle-attractiveness images of each person, for attractiveness. Even though instructed to rate the specific images, not the people, their ratings were biased by the attractiveness of the learned images. A third control experiment, with participants rating names, demonstrated that participants in Experiments 1 and 2 were not simply rating the people, rather than the specific images as instructed. These results show that the formation of attractiveness impressions from faces is mandatory, thus broadening the evidence for automaticity of facial impressions. The mandatory formation of impressions is likely to have an important impact in real-world situations such as online dating sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of Experiment 2: attractiveness ratings of new face images (5 middle-attractiveness images of each identity); and Experiment 3: attractiveness ratings of each identity from only their name. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example stimuli – five images showing the same identity. Stimuli were shown in full colour, and were unconstrained in terms of facial expression, lighting etc. Images in this figure are representative of the experimental stimuli and show an identity not used in the study who has given permission for her images to appear here.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kramer RSS, Ward R. Internal features are signals of personality and health. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010;63(11):2273–2287. doi: 10.1080/17470211003770912. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science. 2005;308:1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1110589. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonakis J, Dalgas O. Predicting elections: Child’s play! Science. 2009;323:1183. doi: 10.1126/science.1167748. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lutz G. The electoral success of beauties and beasts. Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 2010;16:457–480. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00437.x. - DOI
    1. Gilmore DC, Beehr TA, Love KG. Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. J. Occup. Psychol. 1986;59:103–109. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00217.x. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources