Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 14:11:40.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00040. eCollection 2017.

Age-Dependent Changes of Thinking about Verbs

Affiliations

Age-Dependent Changes of Thinking about Verbs

Carolina Bonivento et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

We investigated the knowledge of emotional and motor verbs in children and adolescents from three age ranges (8-11, 12-15, 16-19 years). Participants estimated the verbs familiarity, age of acquisition, valence, arousal, imageability, and motor- and emotion-relatedness. Participants were familiar with the verbs in our dataset. The younger (8-11) attributed an emotional character to the verbs less frequently than the middle (12-15) and the older (16-19) groups. In the 8-11 group males rated the verbs as emotion-related less frequently than females. Results indicate that processing verbal concepts as emotion-related develops gradually, and after 12-15 is rather stable. The age of acquisition (AoA) develops late: the older (16-19) had a higher awareness in reporting that they learnt the verbs earlier as compared to the estimations made by the younger (8-11 and 12-15). AoA positively correlated with attribution of emotion relatedness meaning that emotion-related verbs were learned later. Arousal was comparable across ages. Also it increased when attributing motor relatedness to verbs and decreased when attributing emotion relatedness. Reporting the verbs' affective valence (happy vs. unhappy) changes with age: younger (8-11) judged the verbs generally more "happy" than both the older groups. Instead the middle and the older group did not show differences. Happiness increased when processing the verbs as motor related and decreased when processing the verbs as emotion related. Age affected imageability: the younger (8-11) considered the verbs easier to be imagined than the two older groups, suggesting that at this age vividness estimation is still rough, while after 12-15 is stable as the 12-15 and 15-19 group did not differ. Imageability predicted arousal, AoA, emotion- and motor-relatedness indicating that this index influences the way verbs are processed. Imageability was positively correlated to emotion relatedness, indicating that such verbs were harder to be imagined, and negatively to motor relatedness. Imageablity positively correlated with valence meaning that verbs receiving positive valence were also those that were hard to be imagined, and negatively correlated with arousal, meaning that verbs that were harder to be imagined elicited low physiological activation. Our results give an insight in the development of emotional and motor-related verbs representations.

Keywords: action concepts; age of acquisition; arousal; emotion concepts; emotional valence; imageability; verbs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages judgments within each age range [(A) emotion-related and (D) motor related], within females (F), and males (M) [(B) emotion-related and (E) motor related], within females (F), and males (m) of each age range [(C) emotion-related and (F) motor related]. 8–11, 12–15, 16–19 = participants aged between 8 and 11, 12–15, and 16–19 years, respectively. The significant differences, surviving the Bonferroni correction, are marked (“*”).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean arousal within each age range (A). Within females (F) and males (M) (B), and within females and males of each age range (C). The significant differences, surviving the Bonferroni correction, are marked (“*”). Bars denote standard deviations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean valence within each age range (A), within females (F) and males (M) (B), and within females and males of each age range (C). The significant differences, surviving the Bonferroni correction, are marked (“*”). Bars denote standard deviations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean imageability within each age range (A) within females (F) and males (M) (B) and within females and males of each age range (C). The significant differences, surviving the Bonferroni correction, are marked (“*”). Bars denote standard deviations.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean AOA within each age range (A), within females (F) and males (M) (B), and within females and males of each age range (C). The significant differences, surviving the Bonferroni correction, are marked (“*”). Bars denote standard deviations.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Emotion relatedness (continuous line) and motor relatedness (dotted line) predicting imageability (1 = very easy; 11 = very difficult) (A), arousal (1 = very calm; 9 = very aroused) (B), valence (1 = very happy, 9 = very unhappy) (C) and age of acquisition (AOA; age estimated by the participant) (D).

References

    1. Barak L., Fazly A., Stevenson S. (2012). Modeling the acquisition of mental state verbs, in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (Montreal, QC: Association for Computational Linguistics; ), 1–10.
    1. Baron-Cohen S., Golan O., Wheelwright S., Granader Y. (2010). Emotion word comprehension from 4 to 16 years old: a developmental survey. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 2:109. 10.3389/fnevo.2010.00109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellani M., Bonivento C., Brambilla P. (2012). Interaction between cognition and emotion in developmental psychopathology: the role of linguistic stimuli. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 21, 249–253. 10.1017/S2045796012000273 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bird H., Franklin S., Howard D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33, 73–79. 10.3758/BF03195349 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley M. M., Lang P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.