Sirolimus-Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes With C Type Left Anterior Descending Artery Lesions: A Three-Year Clinical Follow-Up
- PMID: 28352407
- PMCID: PMC5358240
- DOI: 10.4021/cr170w
Sirolimus-Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes With C Type Left Anterior Descending Artery Lesions: A Three-Year Clinical Follow-Up
Abstract
Background: Drug-eluting stents have improved the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention and made it the preferred therapy in the treatment of ischemic heart diseases including acute coronary syndromes. The objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stent with that of zotarolimus-eluting stent following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome patients with C-type left anterior descending stenosis.
Methods: A total of 154 acute coronary syndrome patients with C-type lesions in the left anterior descending artery, requiring a stent > 28 mm in length, were randomized into two groups to receive either sirolimus- (n = 74) or zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 80). The follow-up period after stent implantation was approximately 36 months. The primary endpoint was a major cardiac event (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-related target vessel revascularization), and the secondary endpoint included these individual end points plus stent thrombosis.
Results: After 3 years follow-up, the rate of the primary end point (major cardiac event: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-related target vessel revascularization) was 16% in the sirolimus group (n = 12) versus 11.2% in the zotarolimus group (n = 9) (P = 0.2). Although there were four cases of stent thrombosis with sirolimus-eluting stent and one with zotarolimus-eluting stent (4.0% sirolimus vs. 1.25% zotarolimus; P = 0.2), neither non-Q myocardial infarction (4.0%sirolimus vs. 1.25% zotarolimus; P = 0.2) nor stent thrombosis, differed significantly.
Conclusions: Although zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation showed more favorable results with respect to stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac event rates compared to sirolimus-eluting stent implantation, statistically, both stent groups have nearly similar clinical safety and efficacy in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes with C-type lesions in the left anterior descending artery disease.
Keywords: C-type lesion; Drug-eluting stent; Major adverse cardiac event; Stent thrombosis.
Similar articles
-
Differential clinical outcomes after 1 year versus 5 years in a randomised comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (the SORT OUT III study): a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial.Lancet. 2014 Jun 14;383(9934):2047-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60405-0. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24631162 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in routine clinical care (SORT OUT III): a randomised controlled superiority trial.Lancet. 2010 Mar 27;375(9720):1090-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60208-5. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 20231034 Clinical Trial.
-
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27806902 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with everolimus-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4):e002223. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002223. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25858975 Review.
-
Two zotarolimus-eluting stent generations: a meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials versus other limus-eluting stents and an adjusted indirect comparison.Heart. 2012 Nov;98(22):1632-40. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302519. Epub 2012 Sep 4. Heart. 2012. PMID: 22949487 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources