Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Mar 24:6:16.
doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0143-6. eCollection 2017.

A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals

Affiliations
Editorial

A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals

J Braithwaite et al. Isr J Health Policy Res. .

Abstract

Many types of organisation are difficult to change, mainly due to structural, cultural and contextual barriers. Change in public hospitals is arguably even more problematic than in other types of hospitals, due to features such as structural dysfunctionalities and bureaucracy stemming from being publicly-run institutions. The main goals of this commentary are to bring into focus and highlight the "3 + 3 Decision Framework" proposed by Edwards and Saltman. This aims to help guide policymakers and managers implementing productive change in public hospitals. However, while change from the top is popular, there are powerful front-line clinicians, especially doctors, who can act to counterbalance top-down efforts. Front-line clinicians have cultural characteristics and power that allows them to influence or reject managerial decisions. Clinicians in various lower-level roles can also influence other clinicians to resist or ignore management requirements. The context is further complicated by multi-stakeholder agendas, differing goals, and accumulated inertia. The special status of clinicians, along with other system features of public hospitals, should be factored into efforts to realise major system improvements and progressive change.

Keywords: Complexity science; Health systems; Organisational change; Public health; Systems science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Callen JL, Braithwaite J, Westbrook JI. Cultures in hospitals and their influence on and attitudes to, and satisfaction with, the use of clinical information systems. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(3):635–9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coiera E. Why system inertia makes health reform so difficult. BMJ. 2011;342:d3693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3693. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen D, Braithwaite J, Sandall J, et al., editors. The sociology of healthcare safety and quality. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016. - PubMed
    1. Nugus P, Greenfield D, Travaglia J, et al. How and where clinicians exercise power: interprofessional relations in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(5):898–909. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite J, Westbrook MT, Iedema R, et al. A tale of two hospitals: assessing cultural landscapes and compositions. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(5):1149–62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.046. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources