Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 22;11(1):231-236.
doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0045. eCollection 2016.

Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed?

Marius Kryzauskas  1 , Donatas Danys  1 , Tomas Poskus  1 , Saulius Mikalauskas  1 , Eligijus Poskus  1 , Valdemaras Jotautas  1 , Virgilijus Beisa  1 , Kestutis Strupas  1
Affiliations

Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed?

Marius Kryzauskas et al. Open Med (Wars). .

Abstract

Objective: The optimal diagnostics and treatment of acute appendicitis continues to be a challenge. A false positive diagnosis of appendicitis may lead to an unnecessary operation, which has been appropriately termed negative appendectomy. The aim of our study was to identify the effectiveness of preoperative investigations in preventing negative appendectomy.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on adult patients who underwent operation for suspected acute appendicitis from 2008 to 2013 at Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos. Patients were divided into two groups: group A underwent an operation, where appendix was found to be normal (non-inflamed); group B underwent an appendectomy for inflamed appendix. Groups were compared for preoperative data, investigations, treatment results and pathology findings.

Results: 554 patients were included in the study. Preoperative laboratory tests results of hemoglobin, hematocrit concentrations and white blood cell count were significantly higher in group B (p<0.001). Ultrasonography was performed for 78 % of patients in group A and 74 % in group B and did not provide any statistically significant results. Comparing Alvarado score results, there were more patients with Alvarado score less than 7 in group A than in group B. In our large series we could find only four independent risk factors, and they could only account for 24 % of cases.

Conclusions: In summary, acute appendicitis is still often misdiagnosed and the ratio of negative appendectomies remains rather high. Additional investigations such as observation and computed tomography should be used to prevent this.

Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Delay appendectomy; Negative appendectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Faheu T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisano M, Coccolini F, Poiasina E, Bertoli P, Capponi MG, Poletti E. et al. Conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults. Emerg Med Health Care. 2013;1:2.
    1. Ruffolo C, Fiorot A, Pagura G, Antoniutti M, Massani M, Caratozzolo E. et al. Acute appendicitis: What is the gold standard of treatment? World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(47):8799–8807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zoarets I, Poluksht N, Halevy A. Does Selective Use of Computed Tomography Scan? Reduce the Rate of “White” (Negative) Appendectomy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16:335–337. - PubMed
    1. Hansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009;96(5):473–481. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources