Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;39(10):1026-1036.
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1301392. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Validity of self-reported concentration and memory problems: Relationship with neuropsychological assessment and depression

Rosemarie M Bowler  1 , Shane W Adams  1 , Ralf Schwarzer  2   3 , Vihra V Gocheva  1 , Harry A Roels  4 , Yangho Kim  5 , Catherine L Kircos  1 , Chris W Wright  1 , Michelle Colledge  6 , George Bollweg  7 , Danelle T Lobdell  8
Affiliations

Validity of self-reported concentration and memory problems: Relationship with neuropsychological assessment and depression

Rosemarie M Bowler et al. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the validity of self-reported concentration and memory problems (CMP) in residents environmentally exposed to manganese (Mn).

Method: Self-report of CMP from a health questionnaire (HQ) and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) was compared to neuropsychological assessment (Trails A&B; Digit Span; Digit Symbol; Similarities; Auditory Consonant Trigrams, ACT; NAB Memory; Rey-Osterrieth, Rey-O, Delayed). Participants included 146 residents from Ohio exposed to air-Mn, with a modeled average concentration of 0.55 µg m-3 (range = 0.01-4.58).

Results: Residents were primarily White (94.5%), aged 30-64 years (M = 51.24), with a minimum of 10 years of residence (range = 10-64). Ninety-four (65.3%) participants reported concentration problems, and 107 residents (73.3%) reported memory problems. More participants endorsed CMP on the SCL-90-R than on the HQ. The prevalence of self-reported CMP was higher for women than for men (88.4% vs. 68.3%). Point-biserial and Pearson's correlations between self-reported CMP and neuropsychological test scores were nonsignificant and weak for both the HQ (rpb = -.20 to rpb = .04) and the SCL-90-R (r = -.12 to r = .007). Greater levels of depression, anxiety, and female sex predicted having more self-reported CMP on both the HQ and the SCL-90-R. Air-Mn and blood-Mn were not associated with self-reported CMP. Residential distance from the Mn source accounted for a small proportion of variance (sr2 = .04), although depression remained the largest predictor (sr2 = .21).

Conclusion: These results indicate that self-report of CMP in Mn-exposed residents appear to be invalid when compared to neuropsychological test scores. The participants' misperception of having CMP is associated with less education and higher levels of depression. Neuropsychological assessment is recommended to attain valid results.

Keywords: Cognitive; manganese; neuropsychology; self-report; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

    1. APA American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
    1. ATSDR. Health consultation: Marietta area air investigation. Marietta, Ohio: 2009. Retrieved from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/marietta3/ATSDRMariettaHealthConsultati....
    1. ATSDR. Health consultation: East liverpool air quality. 2010 Retrieved from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/EastLiverpoolHC/EastLiverpoolHealthCons....
    1. Baayen R. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
    1. Bast-Pettersen R. Self-reported conceptions of memory and concentration in comparison with the neuropsychological test performance of manual workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 2006;2(2):41–46.