Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;72(3):188-196.
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(03)10.

Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review

Affiliations

Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review

Ting He et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Mar.

Abstract

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was performed in January 2015 to examine the available literature on validated diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease and to describe the characteristics of the models. Studies that were designed to develop and validate diagnostic models of pre-test probability for stable coronary artery disease were included. Data regarding baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modeling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness were extracted. Ten studies involving the development of 12 models and two studies focusing on external validation were identified. Seven models were validated internally, and seven models were validated externally. Discrimination varied between studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.66-0.81) and externally (0.49-0.87). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of better performing models included sex, age, symptoms, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia as variables. Only two diagnostic models evaluated the effects on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. Most diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease have had modest success, and very few present data regarding the effects of these models on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for eligible studies.

References

    1. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362((10)):886–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907272. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34((38)):2949–3003. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60((24)):e44–e164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isma'eel HA, Serhan M, Sakr GE, Lamaa N, Garabedian T, Elhajj I, et al. Diamond-Forrester and Morise risk models perform poorly in predicting obstructive coronary disease in Middle Eastern Cohort. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:803–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jia Z, Junjie Y, Ying Z, Xiaobo Y, Huawei Z, Yundai C. Diagnostic accuracy of pre-test probability combined with computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients suspected for stable coronary artery disease. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch. 2015;36:313–7.

Publication types