Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 1;74(5):493-500.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0284.

Development and Validation of a Clinically Based Risk Calculator for the Transdiagnostic Prediction of Psychosis

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Clinically Based Risk Calculator for the Transdiagnostic Prediction of Psychosis

Paolo Fusar-Poli et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Table Column Heading.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):759. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1147. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29801088 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: The overall effect of At Risk Mental State (ARMS) services for the detection of individuals who will develop psychosis in secondary mental health care is undetermined.

Objective: To measure the proportion of individuals with a first episode of psychosis detected by ARMS services in secondary mental health services, and to develop and externally validate a practical web-based individualized risk calculator tool for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care.

Design, setting, and participants: Clinical register-based cohort study. Patients were drawn from electronic, real-world, real-time clinical records relating to 2008 to 2015 routine secondary mental health care in the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust. The study included all patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust in the period between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. Data analysis began on September 1, 2016.

Main outcomes and measures: Risk of development of nonorganic International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision psychotic disorders.

Results: A total of 91 199 patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust were included in the derivation (n = 33 820) or external validation (n = 54 716) data sets. The mean age was 32.97 years, 50.88% were men, and 61.05% were white race/ethnicity. The mean follow-up was 1588 days. The overall 6-year risk of psychosis in secondary mental health care was 3.02 (95% CI, 2.88-3.15), which is higher than the 6-year risk in the local general population (0.62). Compared with the ARMS designation, all of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses showed a lower risk of psychosis, with the exception of bipolar mood disorders (similar risk) and brief psychotic episodes (higher risk). The ARMS designation accounted only for a small proportion of transitions to psychosis (n = 52 of 1001; 5.19% in the derivation data set), indicating the need for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. A prognostic risk stratification model based on preselected variables, including index diagnosis, age, sex, age by sex, and race/ethnicity, was developed and externally validated, showing good performance and potential clinical usefulness.

Conclusions and relevance: This online individualized risk calculator can be of clinical usefulness for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. The risk calculator can help to identify those patients at risk of developing psychosis who require an ARMS assessment and specialized care. The use of this calculator may eventually facilitate the implementation of an individualized provision of preventive focused interventions and improve outcomes of first episode psychosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Study Population
ARMS indicates At Risk Mental State; SLaM, South London and the Maudsley.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Decision Curve Analysis
Decision curve analysis estimated in the validation data set, showing the potential clinical usefulness of the risk calculator at different threshold probabilities (risk of developing psychosis by 5 years) for focused interventions to prevent psychosis (assessment and care), compared with treating all patients or to treating no patients at all.

References

    1. Millan MJ, Andrieux A, Bartzokis G, et al. . Altering the course of schizophrenia: progress and perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(7):485-515. - PubMed
    1. Jääskeläinen E, Juola P, Hirvonen N, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(6):1296-1306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fusar Poli P, McGorry P, Kane J. Improving outcomes of first episode psychosis. World Psychiatry. in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yung AR, McGorry PD, McFarlane CA, Jackson HJ, Patton GC, Rakkar A. Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):283-303. - PubMed
    1. Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Rutigliano G, et al. . At risk or not at risk? a meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(3):322-332. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types