The diagnostic utility of patient-report and speech-language pathologists' ratings for detecting the early onset of bulbar symptoms due to ALS
- PMID: 28355886
- PMCID: PMC5530595
- DOI: 10.1080/21678421.2017.1303515
The diagnostic utility of patient-report and speech-language pathologists' ratings for detecting the early onset of bulbar symptoms due to ALS
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of clinician speech ratings and patient self-report for detecting early bulbar changes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), compared to instrumentation-based speech measures.
Methods: Thirty-six individuals with ALS and 17 healthy control participants were included. Patients' awareness of early bulbar motor involvement was assessed using self-reported scores on the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Clinicians' detection of early bulbar motor involvement was assessed through perceptual speech ratings by two experienced speech-language pathologists. Participants with ALS were grouped as 'bulbar pre-symptomatic' or 'bulbar symptomatic' based on self-report and clinician ratings, and compared to healthy controls on six instrumentation-based speech measures. ROC analysis was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of perceptual and instrumentation-based measures for detecting bulbar changes in pre-symptomatic individuals.
Results: Early bulbar changes that were documented using instrumentation-based measures were undetected by both patients and clinicians. ROC analyses indicated that instrumentation-based measures outperformed clinicians' scaled severity ratings, and that percent pause time was the best measure for differentiating healthy controls from bulbar pre-symptomatic individuals with ALS.
Conclusions: Findings suggested that instrumentation-based measures of speech may be necessary for early detection of bulbar changes due to ALS.
Keywords: Bulbar; early detection; speech motor impairment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. This research was funded by NIH-NIDCD grants R01DC009890 and R01DC0135470.
Figures
References
-
- Armon C, Moses D. Linear estimates of rates of disease progression as predictors of survival in patients with ALS entering clinical trials. J Neurol Sci. 1998:S37–41. - PubMed
-
- del Aguila MA, Longstreth WT, McGuire V, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. Neurology. 2003;60(5):813–9. - PubMed
-
- Nzwalo H, de Abreu D, Swash M, Pinto S, de Carvalho M. Delayed diagnosis in ALS: The problem continues. J Neurol Sci. 2014;343(1):173–5. - PubMed
-
- Turner MR, Scaber J, Goodfellow JA, Lord ME, Marsden R, Talbot K. The diagnostic pathway and prognosis in bulbar-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2010;294(1):81–5. - PubMed
-
- DePaul R, Brooks BR. Multiple Orofacial Indices in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1993;36(6):1158. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous